Non-dehiscent sesame variety Sesaco 29

ABSTRACT

A non-dehiscent sesame ( Sesamum indicum  L.) designated Sesaco 29 (S29) has been found. Its degree of shatter resistance, or seed retention, makes S29 suitable for mechanized harvesting.

TECHNICAL FIELD OF INVENTION

This invention relates to a new Sesamum indicum variety appropriate for mechanized harvesting.

BACKGROUND

Sesame, or Sesamum indicum, is a tropical annual cultivated worldwide for its oil and its nut flavored seeds. In the Middle East, sesame is consumed as tahini, a sesame butter or sesame paste which is often mixed with ground chickpea kernels in a food preparation called hummus. Sesame is used widely in China, Japan, and Korea as a cooking oil, and it is consumed for its medicinal qualities. In recent years, the Japanese have been identifying and quantifying the medicinal benefits of sesame. In vitro studies and animal studies have indicated several antioxidant properties of sesame (Namiki, M. 1995. “The chemistry and physiological functions of sesame,” Food Rev Int 11:281-329). In the western hemisphere, sesame is primarily used in the confectionary trade in rolls and crackers. Throughout the world, sesame seeds or paste are mixed into sweets, e.g., halva. Sesame oil use in the cosmetic industry continues to expand.

The sesame plant grows to a height of about 56-249 cm, and at its leaf axils are found capsules which contain the sesame seed. Upon maturity in nature, the capsules holding the sesame seeds begin to dry down, the capsules normally split open, and the seeds fall out. Commercially, the harvester tries to recover as much seed as possible from mature capsules. From ancient times through the present, the opening of the capsule has been the major factor in attempting to successfully collect the seed. Harvesting methods, weather, and plant characteristics all contribute to the amount of seed recovered.

The majority of the world's sesame is harvested manually. With manual non-mechanized methods, it is desirable for the sesame seed to fall readily from the plant. Upon physiological maturity, the sesame stalks are cut, tied into small bundles, and then stacked in shocks. Further harvesting procedures vary from country to country and from area to area within countries. Some move the shocks to a threshing floor so that the seed that falls out can be recovered. Others put plastic or cloth in the fields under the shocks to catch the seed. For manual harvesting methods in which the dried, shocked sesame is moved to a threshing floor or over a plastic or cloth, preferred plant varieties include dehiscent, or super shattering, in which less than 10% of the seeds set are retained in the capsule.

Other methods involve leaving the shocks in the fields, and when the shocks are dry, the sesame is turned upside down and struck with an implement to shake out all of the seed. For this type of manual harvesting method, it is preferred that the capsule hold as much of the sesame seed as possible until the farmer inverts the stalk. Plant varieties rated as shattering which retain as much seed as possible before inversion are preferred. Common methods of manual harvest are discussed in Weiss, E. A. “Sesame”, Oilseed crops (2^(nd) ed.), Chapter 5, Blackwell Science, Inc., Malden, Mass., p. 131-164 (2000).

In an effort to mechanize the harvest of sesame, D. G. Langham introduced the use of binders in Venezuela in 1944. The binders were used to cut and bundle the sesame plants, manual labor was used to shock the cut plants, and combines were brought in to thrash the shocks. It was determined that seed shattering during mechanized harvesting methods caused considerable loss of sesame seed. While mechanization was considered to be essential for crop production in the Western hemisphere, it became obvious that the dehiscence of the sesame seed pod was the principal obstacle to the widespread acceptance of sesame as a commercial crop. (Langham, D. G. 1949. “Improvement of Sesame in Venezuela,” Proceedings First International Sesame Conference, Clemson Agricultural College, Clemson, S.C., pp. 74-79). As programs to introduce sesame production in the United States in Arizona, South Carolina, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas were initiated, mechanization was considered essential due to high labor costs. Kalton, one of the Texas researchers, reported that the shattering nature of available strains was the main obstacle in complete mechanization of the sesame crop. (Kalton, R. 1949. “Sesame, a promising new oilseed crop for Texas,” Proc First International Sesame Conference, Clemson Agricultural College, Clemson, S.C., pp. 62-66).

In 1943, D. G. Langham found a mutation on a sesame plant. Capsules did not open on plants expressing this mutation. In succeeding generations, Langham showed that it was a recessive single gene which produced this indehiscence, where all the seeds were retained inside the unopened capsule. While it was believed that indehiscence would solve the problem of seed loss on mechanized harvesting, it was found that the capsules were too tough to effectively release the seed. Many of the capsules passed through a combine without opening. When more rigorous combining was attempted, an increase in efficiency of capsule opening was achieved but at the expense of seed quality. Seeds were broken due to the more rigorous combine conditions, and the broken seeds released free fatty acids. Chemical reactions with free fatty acids led to rancidity and concomitant undesirability of the harvested seed.

The indehiscent sesame varieties described above were used by various plant breeders in an attempt to develop desirable sesame lines. In addition to traditional cross-breeding approaches, some attempted to alter the chromosome numbers through tetraploids and interspecific crosses. Yermanos attempted to improve release of seed by increasing the length of the capsule so that there would be more surface for the combine to crack the capsules open (personal communication). Unfortunately, even with a small opening on the top of the capsule, a high percentage of broken seed was found on mechanized harvesting, preventing commercial use of this sesame line.

D. G. Langham reported in the late 1950's that the placenta attachment between each sesame seed and the placenta was important in the retention of seed in the capsule. He believed that he could improve the shatter resistance of sesame with increased placenta attachment but did not believe that all the seed could be retained in the capsule (Langham, D. G., Rodriguez, Maximo, and Reveron Esteban. 1956. “Dehiscencia y otras características del ajonjolí, Sesamum indicum L., en relación con el problema de la cosecha”, Genesa, Maracay, Venezuela, pp. 3-16). However, Yermanos reported that during capsule maturity, the placenta attachment gradually weakens and is obliterated when the capsule is completely desiccated. (Yermanos, D. M. 1980. “Sesame. Hybridization of crop plants,” Am Soc Agronomy-Crop Sci of America, pp. 549-563). Thus, it appeared that the placenta attachment would have little effect on seed retention in dry, mature capsules during harvesting. A seamless gene which retained all the seed in the capsules was discovered by D. G. Langham and D. R. Langham in 1986. This was crossed with shattering types, and some progeny had an opening at the tip of the capsule. The seamless capsules were similar to the indehiscent capsules in that it was too difficult to remove the seed from the capsule without damaging the seed.

In 1982, the first non-shattering line (retaining 50-70% of the seeds set) requiring no manual labor was introduced. This line could be harvested by swathing the sesame, leaving it to dry in the field, and then picking it up by a combine. Although complete mechanization was achieved, extensive loss of seed due to adverse weather conditions continued to occur. (Langham, D. R., “Shatter resistance in sesame”, In: L. Van Zanten (ed.), Sesame improvements by induced mutations, Proc. Final FAO/IAEA Co-ord. Res. Mtng., IAEA, Vienna, TECDOC-1195, p. 51-61 (2001)).

Other varieties were developed between 1988 and 1997 which allowed for direct combining with 70-90% seed retention, but extensive loss of seed due to wind and rain continued to occur. Lines that generally yielded 80% of the seed under ideal conditions would yield only 45-65% under adverse conditions. Thus, while many of the crosses began to moderate the deleterious effects of mechanized harvesting, none were able to increase the yields to the level of manually harvesting shattering cultivars.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,100,452 which issued Aug. 8, 2000, disclosed non-dehiscent sesame lines Sesaco 22 (S22), Sesaco 23 (S23), Sesaco 24 (S24), 19A, and 11W, representative seed having been deposited under ATCC accession number PTA-1400, PTA-1401, PTA-1402, PTA-1399, and PTA-1398, respectively. These sesame lines are characterized by their high degree of seed retention within the capsule despite adverse weather conditions such as wind and rain and the retention of a sufficient amount of sesame seed during mechanized harvesting to be competitive with manual harvesting with minimization of seed breakage.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,815,576 which issued Nov. 9, 2004, disclosed a non-dehiscent sesame cultivar S25, representative seed having been deposited under ATCC accession number PTA-4258. S25 is a stable, commercially suitable sesame line providing an early maturity cycle which extends the planting region to more northern latitudes and improved resistance against common fungal diseases.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,781,031 which issued Aug. 24, 2004, disclosed a non-dehiscent sesame cultivar S26, representative seed having been deposited under ATCC accession number PTA-4317. S26 is a stable, commercially suitable sesame line providing improved drought resistance, improved resistance against common fungal diseases, a larger seed, and a later maturity cycle which limits the planting region to more southern latitudes.

U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/881,721, filed Jun. 30, 2004, disclosed a non-dehiscent sesame cultivar S28, representative seed having been deposited under ATCC accession number PTA-6008. S28 is a stable, commercially suitable sesame line providing improved resistance against common fungal diseases, a comparably large seed, and an early maturity cycle which extends the planting region to more northern latitudes.

A non-dehiscent variety designated Sesaco 29 (S29) has now been found which provides some improvements over previously disclosed non-dehiscent sesame lines.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect, the present invention is seed of sesame variety designated S29, a sample of the seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598.

In another aspect, the present invention is a sesame plant or parts thereof produced by growing the seed of sesame variety S29, a sample of the seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598. Pollen is one of the sesame plant parts of the present invention.

In another aspect, the present invention is a sesame plant having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of sesame variety S29, a sample of the seed of the variety having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598.

In another aspect, the present invention is a sesame plant having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of a sesame plant produced by growing seed of sesame variety S29, a sample of the seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598.

In another aspect, the present invention is a tissue culture of regenerable cells produced from seed of sesame variety S29, a sample of the seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598.

In another aspect, the present invention is a tissue culture of regenerable cells produced from sesame plant S29 or a part thereof produced by growing the seed of sesame variety S29, a sample of the seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598.

In another aspect, the present invention is a sesame plant regenerated from a tissue culture of regenerable cells produced from seed of sesame variety S29, a sample of the seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598, wherein the regenerated sesame plant has all the physiological and morphological characteristics of sesame variety S29.

In another aspect, the present invention is a sesame plant regenerated from a tissue culture of regenerable cells produced from a sesame plant produced by growing the seed of sesame variety S29, a sample of the seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598, wherein the regenerated sesame plant has all the physiological and morphological characteristics of sesame variety plant S29.

In another aspect, the present invention is a method of producing sesame seed, comprising crossing a first parent sesame plant with a second parent sesame plant, and harvesting the resultant sesame seed, wherein the first or second parent sesame plant was produced by growing seed of sesame variety S29, a sample of the seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts the lineage of S29.

FIG. 2 depicts a comparison of the percent of seed retention during in shaker shatter resistance testing from 1997 to 2004 for sesame varieties released by Sesaco: Sesaco 01 (S01) released in 1982, Sesaco 02 (S02) released in 1983-1987, Sesaco 03 (S03) released in 1985-1986, Sesaco 04 (S04) released in 1984-1987, Sesaco 05 (S05) released in 1984, Sesaco 06 (S06) released in 1984, Sesaco 07 (S07) released in 1985-1988, Sesaco 08 (S08) released in 1986, Sesaco 09 (S09) released in 1985-1986, Sesaco 10 (S10) released in 1988-1991, Sesaco 11 (S11) released in 1988-1995, Sesaco 12 (S12) released in 1986-1987, Sesaco 14 (S14) released in 1989, Sesaco 15 (S15) released in 1990-1991, Sesaco 16 (S16) released in 1991-1996, Sesaco 17 (S17) released in 1993-1998, Sesaco 18 (S18) released in 1994-1996, Sesaco 19 (S19) released in 1994-1995, Sesaco 20 (S20) released in 1995-1997, Sesaco 21(S21) released in 1995-1998, Sesaco 22 (S22) released in 1997-1998, Sesaco 23 (S23) released in 1998-2000, Sesaco 24 (S24) released in 1998-2004, Sesaco 25 (S25) released in 2001-2005, Sesaco 26 (S26) released in 2002-2005; Sesaco 28 (S28) released in 2004-2005; and Sesaco 29 (S29) released in 2005.

FIG. 3 depicts a comparison of the kill resistance ratings in Uvalde, Tex., in 2004 for the varieties released by Sesaco.

FIG. 4 depicts a comparison of the mean days to physiological maturity from 1998 to 2004 for the varieties released by Sesaco. Each year depending on the environment, the number of days will change. S24 is the standard, and it is adjusted to 95 days and all of the other varieties are adjusted around S24.

FIG. 5 depicts a comparison of the mean weight of 100 seeds in grams from 1997 to 2004 for the varieties released by Sesaco.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Sesame cultivar Sesaco 29 (hereinafter “S29”) is a non-dehiscent sesame variety having superior characteristics which make it a commercially suitable sesame line. S29 exhibits non-dehiscence as defined in U.S. Pat. No. 6,100,452, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference, making it suitable for mechanized harvesting. In addition, S29 has large seed size which is desirable for processors, comparable shatter resistance, earlier maturity which allows a wider geographical range, and improved resistance against common fungal diseases.

The recommended geographical area for S29 is from South Texas at the Rio Grande to northern Oklahoma and from east Texas westward to elevations below 1,000 meters. S29 can be planted in other areas as well and has been found to do do well in Arizona. S29 has not been tested in other states or countries to date, but it is projected that it would perform well in New Mexico and California. S29 has not been exposed to the sesame diseases that have been reported east of Texas.

Sesaco used the pedigree method of plant breeding to develop S29. Sesame is generally self-pollinated. Crossing is done using standard techniques as delineated in Yermanos, D. M. 1980. “Sesame. Hybridization of crop plants,” Am Soc Agronomy-Crop Sci of America, pp. 549-563 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,100,452. Ashri provides an overview of sesame breeding in Ashri, A. (1998). “Sesame breeding,” Plant Breed. Rev. 16:179-228. When Sesaco started the U.S. breeding program in 1978, there were no lines with all of the desirable characters for mechanization of sesame. Development of new varieties has depended on building blocks of desirable characters and then bringing in other blocks of desirable characters.

The lineage of S29 is presented in FIG. 1. 111 (1) was a line obtained from the National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) (PI173955) in 1979 and first planted by Sesaco in the Woods nursery (Wellton, Ariz.) in 1981. NPGS obtained it in 1949 from W. N. Koelz, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Beltsville, Md. who obtained it from India. Within Sesaco, 111 first carried the identifier 0858 and was then changed to X111. In 1984, a selection of this line became Sesaco 4 (S04).

111X (2) was an outcross in the plot BT0458 in the Nickerson nursery (Yuma, Ariz.) in 1982. Within Sesaco, it carried the identifier E0745.

F820 (3) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Nickerson nursery (Yuma, Ariz.) in 1982. Within Sesaco, it carried the identifier F820.

104 (4) was a line obtained from the Sesamum Foundation (D. G. Langham, Fallbrook, Calif.) in 1977 and first planted in the Kamman nursery (Wellton, Ariz.) in 1978. It was obtained with the designator SF084. The Sesamum Foundation obtained it from Maximo Rodriguez in 1961. He had collected it from Mexico where it was known as Instituto 8. Instituto 8 was a selection from G53.48, a cross made by D. G. Langham in 1953 in Guacara, Venezuela. Within Sesaco, 104 carried the identifier 0084. In 1983, a selection of this line became Sesaco 2 (S02).

578 (5) was a cross made by Sesaco in the McElhaney nursery (Wellton, Ariz.) in 1983. Within Sesaco, it carried the identifier G8578 and then changed to T578.

F853 (6) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Nickerson nursery (Yuma, Ariz.) in 1982. Within Sesaco, it carried the identifier F853.

192 (7) was a line obtained from the M. L. Kinman in 1980 and first planted by Sesaco in the Woods nursery (Wellton, Ariz.) in 1981. The line was originally T61429-B-4-1-3 from the Kinman USDA sesame program, College Station, Tex., which had been in cold storage at Ft. Collins, Colo. In 1997, the line was transferred to the NPGS, Griffin, Ga. and given the identifier PI599462. Within Sesaco, 192 first carried the identifier 1479 and then was changed to X191 and X193. In 1985, a selection from X193 became Sesaco 3 (S03) and a selection of X191 became Sesaco 7 (S07).

(8) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Ramsey nursery (Roll, Ariz.) in 1984. Within Sesaco, it carried the identifier H0031 and then changed to T031.

118 (9) was a line obtained from the NGPS (PI425944) in 1979 and first planted in Kamman nursery (Wellton, Ariz.) in 1979. The NGPS obtained it in 1978 from P. F. Knowles, University of Calif., Davis, Calif., who collected it in Pakistan. Within Sesaco, it carried the identifier 1118 and then changed to X118 and then to T118.

3CD (10) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Friesenhahn nursery (Knippa, Tex.) in 1995. Within Sesaco, it carried the identifier DP550 and then changed to X3CD and then to T3CD.

G8 (11) was a line obtained from D. G. Langham in 1977 and first planted by Sesaco in the Kamman nursery (Wellton, Ariz.) in 1978. It was a selection from the cultivar ‘Guacara’ which D. G. Langham developed in Venezuela in the 1950s. Guacara was an initial selection from a cross that later produced one of the major varieties in Venezuela—Aceitera. Within Sesaco, G8 first carried the identifier XO11 and was later changed to TG8.

804 (12) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Nickerson nursery (Yuma, Ariz.) in 1982. Within Sesaco, it has carried the identifier F804; in 1988, a selection of this line became Sesaco 11 (S11).

56B (13) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Wright nursery (Tacna, Ariz.) in 1987. Within Sesaco, it first carried the identifier KAN00 and was later changed to X56B and then to T56B.

F822 (14) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Nickerson nursery (Yuma, Ariz.) in 1982. Within Sesaco, it has carried the identifier F822.

562 (15) was a cross made by Sesaco in the McElhaney nursery (Wellton, Ariz.) in 1983. Within Sesaco, it first carried the identifier G8562 and was later changed to T562.

700 (16) was a line obtained from the NPGS (PI292144) in 1979 and first planted by Sesaco in the Woods nursery (Wellton, Ariz.) in 1981. NPGS obtained it in 1963 from Hybritech Seed International, a unit of Monsanto, U.S., which obtained it from Israel. In viewing this material in 1986, A. Ashri of Israel concluded that it was an introduction to Israel. The material is similar to introductions from India and Pakistan. Within Sesaco, 700 first carried the identifier 0700 and was later changed to T700.

13C (17) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Gilleland nursery (Uvalde, Tex.) in 1990. Within Sesaco, 13C first carried the identifier PF270 and was then changed to X13C and then to T13C.

888 (18) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Nickerson nursery (Yuma, Ariz.) in 1982. Within Sesaco, 888 first carried the identifier F888 and was later changed to T888.

V52 (19) was a cultivar designated as SF075 obtained from the Sesamum Foundation (D. G. Langham, Fallbrook, Calif.) collection in 1977 and first planted by Sesaco in the Kamman nursery (Wellton, Ariz.) in 1978. The Sesamum Foundation obtained it from B. Mazzani (Maracay, Venezuela) in 1960. Originally, it was a cultivar known as Venezuela 52 developed by D. G. Langham in the 1940s. Within Sesaco, V52 first carried the identifier 0075 and was later changed to TV52.

K0367 (20) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Hancock nursery (Wellton, Ariz.) in 1986. Within Sesaco, it has carried the identifier K0367.

88B (21) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Wright nursery (Tacna, Ariz.) in 1987. Within Sesaco, it first carried the identifier KAC32 and was later changed to X88B and then to T88B.

S11 (22) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Nickerson nursery (Yuma, Ariz.) in 1982. Within Sesaco, it has carried the identifier F804; in 1988, a selection of this line became Sesaco 11 (S11).

S24 (23) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Sharp nursery (Tacna, Ariz.) in 1989. Within Sesaco, it first carried the identifier N2248 which was changed to X6BF. In 1998 a selection of this line became Sesaco 24.

S29 (24) was a cross made by Sesaco in the Gilleland nursery (Uvalde, Tex.) in 1998. The original designator was GC970. The seed (C970) was planted in the Uvalde greenhouse in 1998. The seed from this plant (E374) was planted in plot D107 the Schwartz nursery (Wall, Tex.) in 1999. Two plants were selected based on “branches on branches, seed to the top, and low plants.” The seed (5893) from one of the plants was planted in plot 1146 in the Gilleland nursery (Uvalde, Tex.) in 2000. Nine plants were selected based on “kill resistance plus weather shatter resistance, thin leaf, high seed weight per capsule.” The seed (3575) from one of the plants was planted in plot 1016 in the Gilleland nursery (Uvalde, Tex.) in 2001. Four plants were selected based on “lot of capsules down the row, weather shatter resistance, and OK plant height.” The seed (3541) from another plant was planted in plot A552 in the Schwartz nursery (Wall, Tex.) in 2001. Five plants were selected based on “very good yield.” The seed (1246) from one of the plants in plot 1016 was planted in plot 0571 in the Gilleland nursery (Uvalde, Tex.) in 2002. Twenty-eight plants were selected based on “very good yield in Uvalde and San Angelo, early, light seeker, and lot of capsules down the row.” There was also a yield sample taken out of this plot. The seed (4183) from one of the plants in plot A552 was planted in plot 0577 in the Gilleland nursery (Uvalde, Tex.) in 2002. Thirty-one plants were selected based on “very uniform, very good yield, early, light seeker, and lot of capsules down the row.” The seed (4047) from plot 0577 was planted in the strip VE16 in the Panther City nursery (Batesville, Tex.). The seed (Y040) from the yield sample from plot 0571 was planted in the next strip, VE30. The seed (3497) from plot 0571 was planted in the next strip, VE43. All three strips were uniform and they were combined together. The combined seed was tested on two farms: the Schwartz farm (Wall, Tex.) and the Lefevre farm (Rule, Tex.), and the seed combined.

Along with breeding programs, tissue culture of sesame is currently being practiced in Korea, Japan, China, India, Sri Lanka and the United States. It is possible for one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize sesame plants grown from tissue culture as parental lines in the production of non-dehiscent sesame. Further, it is possible to propagate non-dehiscent sesame through tissue culture methods. By means well known in the art, sesame plants can be regenerated from tissue culture having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of the source plant.

The present invention includes the seed of sesame variety S29 deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598; a sesame plant or parts thereof produced by growing the seed deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598; any sesame plant having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of sesame variety S29; any sesame plant all the physiological and morphological characteristics of a sesame plant produced by growing the seed deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598. The present invention also includes a tissue culture of regenerable cells produced from the seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598 or a tissue culture of regenerable cells from sesame variety S29 or a part thereof produced by growing the seed of sesame variety S29 having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598. A sesame plant regenerated from a tissue culture of regenerable cells produced from the seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598 or from sesame variety S29, wherein the regenerated sesame plant has all the physiological and morphological characteristics of sesame variety S29 is also contemplated by the present invention. Methods of producing sesame seed, comprising crossing a first parent sesame plant with a second parent sesame plant, wherein the first or second parent sesame plant was produced by seed having been deposited under ATCC Patent Deposit Designation No. PTA-6598 are part of the present invention.

Unless otherwise stated, as used herein, the term plant includes plant cells, plant protoplasts, plant cell tissue cultures from which sesame plants can be regenerated, plant calli, plant clumps, plant cells that are intact in plants, or parts of plants, such as embryos, pollen, ovules, flowers, capsules, stems, leaves, seeds, roots, root tips, and the like. Further, unless otherwise stated, as used herein, the term progeny includes plants derived from plant cells, plant protoplasts, plant cell tissue cultures from which sesame plants can be regenerated, plant calli, plant clumps, plant cells that are intact in plants, or parts of plants, such as embryos, pollen, ovules, flowers, capsules, stems, leaves, seeds, roots, root tips, and the like.

Sesame cultivar S29 has been extensively experimentally grown in the first two of the following four nurseries, and one year in the last two nurseries:

(1) Uvalde nursery planted north of Uvalde, Tex. (latitude 29°22′ north, longitude 99°47′ west, 226 m elev) in middle to late May from 1988-2004; mean rainfall is 608 mm annually with a mean of 253 mm during the growing season; temperatures range from an average low of 3° C. and an average high of 17° C. in January to an average low of 22° C. and an average high of 37° C. in July. The nursery was planted on 96 cm beds from 1988 to 1997 and on 76 cm beds from 1998 to 2001. The nursery was pre-irrigated and has had 2-3 post-plant irrigations depending on rainfall. The fertility has varied from 30-60 units of nitrogen. There is little data for 2003 because the Uvalde nursery was first hit by a hail storm, and then the eye of hurricane Claudette passed over the nursery with sustained winds over 80 kph. The data is not considered typical based on 16 years of data in that area; and

(2) San Angelo nursery planted east of San Angelo, Tex. (latitude 31°21′ north, longitude 100°30′ west, 908 m elev) in early to middle June from 1992-2002; mean rainfall is 490 mm annually with a mean of 201 mm during the growing season; temperatures range from an average low of 0° C. and an average high of 15° C. in January to an average low of 22° C. and an average high of 36° C. in July. The nursery was planted on 101 cm beds. The nursery was pre-irrigated in years when there was no planting rain and has had 0 to 1 post-plant irrigations depending on rainfall. The fertility has varied from 20-50 units of nitrogen. There is no data for 2003 because the sample sizes were too low to be considered valid; and

(3) Lorenzo nursery planted southeast of Lubbock, Tex. (latitude 33°40′ north, longitude 101°49′ west, 1000 m elev) in mid June in 2004; mean rainfall is 483 mm annually with a mean of 320 mm during the growing season; temperatures range from an average low of −4° C. and an average high of 11° C. in January to an average low of 20° C. and an average high of 33° C. in July. The nursery was planted on 101 cm beds. The nursery was rainfed. The fertility was 30 units of nitrogen; and

(4) Yuma nursery planted east of Yuma, Ariz. (latitude 32°39′ north, longitude 114°36′ west, 66 m elev) in mid April in 2004; mean rainfall is 101 mm annually with a mean of 38 mm during the growing season; temperatures range from an average low of 5° C. and an average high of 20° C. in January to an average low of 25° C. and an average high of 41° C. in July. The nursery was planted on 107 cm beds in two rows 17 cm apart. The nursery was sprinkled up and had 5 post-plant irrigations depending on rainfall. The fertility was units 80 units of nitrogen.

Sesame cultivar S29 has shown uniformity and stability within the limits of environmental influence for the characters listed in Table I below. Table I provides the name, definition, and rating scale of each character as well as the method by which the character is measured. Under the rating section, the rating for S29 is presented in bold text. Additionally, the distribution of the character in Sesaco's sesame development program is indicated under the rating section. Sesaco uses slightly different character specifications from “Descriptors for sesame”, AGP:IBPGR/80/71, IBPGR Secretariat, Rome, (1981) and from the form “Sesame (Sesamum indicum)”, U.S. Department of Agriculture Plant Variety Protection Office, Beltsville, Md. The descriptors in those documents were developed in the early 1980s and have not been updated to incorporate new concepts in sesame data collection.

Regarding the data given in Table I, the averages and distributions within Sesaco varieties of most characters have not changed from previous reports because there has been little substantive change.

TABLE I Characters Distinguishing the S29 Line Character Rating Methodology (1) BRANCHING Subjective rating The amount of branching on any particular STYLE Values: plant depends on the space around the plant. In The potential amount of U = Uniculm - no branching high populations, branching can be suppressed. true branching in a line except weak branches in This rating should be based on potential as open expressed on end plants and plants in the open. B = True branches True branches start in the leaf axil below S29 = B for all crops in all the first flower, and they begin to emerge nurseries before the first open flower. As long as there is Distribution within Sesaco light into the leaf axils, there will be additional based on stable lines in the branches that start below the first branches in crossing program in 1982-2001 subsequently lower nodes. Weak branches (Total number of occur when a plant is in the open. They samples tested = 1,333) develop in the lowest nodes and subsequent U = 42.4% branches start at higher nodes. There are lines B = 57.6% that will not branch in any circumstance. Some lines in the open will put on spontaneous branches late in the cycle. True and weak branches do not have a capsule in the same leaf axil, whereas the spontaneous branches form under the capsule after the capsule has formed. Spontaneous branches are not counted as branches. There are rare lines where the flowering pattern is to put on flowers on lower nodes late in the cycle. In this case, the capsule is formed after the branch is developed. This pattern should not be termed spontaneous branching, and the branch is normally counted as a true branch. There are branched lines that have secondary branches on the branches. In a few cases, there can be tertiary branches. Additional branches generally appear in low populations. Comments: the effects of light appear to have more of an effect on branching than moisture and fertility. High populations suppress branching. (2) NUMBER OF Subjective rating Rating can be taken from about 60 days CAPSULES PER Values: after planting through to the end of the crop. LEAF AXIL 1 = Single Number of Capsules per Leaf Axil is highly The predominant number 3 = Triple dependent on moisture, fertility, and light. In of capsules per leaf axil in Based on potential as triple capsule lines, the central capsule forms the middle half of the described in the methodology first, and axillary capsules follow a few days capsule zone presented herein later. Triple capsule lines have the potential to S29 = 1 for all crops in all put on axillaries, but will not do so if plants do nurseries not have adequate moisture and/or fertility. In Distribution within Sesaco drought conditions, some triple capsule lines based on stable lines in the will produce only a central capsule for many crossing program in 1982-2001 nodes. In these lines, when there is adequate (Total number of moisture through rain or irrigation, some will samples tested = 1,327) add axillary capsules on only new nodes, while 1 = 58.3% others will add axillary capsules to all nodes. 3 = 41.7% Some triple capsule lines will not put on axillary capsules if there is no direct sunlight on the leaf axil. To date, lines with single capsules have nectaries next to the central capsule in the middle of the capsule zone while triple capsules do not. However, some lines have what appear to be nectaries on the lower capsules of triple lines, but upon close examination, they are buds which may or may not eventually develop into a flower and then a capsule. In most triple capsule lines, the lower and upper nodes have single capsules. There are some lines where the end plants can put on 5 capsules/leaf axil and a few that have the potential to put on 7 capsules/leaf axil. 5 and 7 capsules only appear with open plants with high moisture and fertility. In some environments, single capsule lines will put on multiple capsules on 1 node and rarely on up to 5 nodes. These lines are not considered triple capsule lines. (3) MATURITY CLASS Subjective rating The basis for this data point is Days to The maturity of a line in Values: Physiological Maturity (Character No. 27). S24 relation to a standard line. V = Very early (<85 days) is the standard line to be used to compute Currently, the standard E = Early (85-94 days) Maturity Class. In 1998-2001, the maturity of line is S24 at 95 days M = Medium (95-104 days) S24 averaged 95 days in the Uvalde, TX, L = Late (105-114 days) nursery. For each line, the physiological T = Very late (>114 days) maturity for each year is subtracted by the S24 S29 = E in 2001-2004 in maturity for that year in that nursery, and then Uvalde nursery^(a) the number of days of difference is averaged. Distribution within Sesaco The average is then added to 95. based on stable lines in the See Days to Physiological Maturity crossing program in 1998-2001 (Character No. 27) for the effects of the (Total number of environment on Maturity Class. samples tested = 650) V = 1.2% E = 26.8% M = 56.2% L = 12.9% T = 2.9% (4) PLANT Subjective rating The first character is the Branching Style PHENOTYPE Values: (Character No. 1), followed by the Number of A three character Branching Style Capsules per Leaf Axil (Character No. 2), and designation that provides U = Uniculm - no branching then the Maturity Class (Character No. 3). the branching style, except weak branches in When these characters are placed in a number of capsules per open matrix, there are 20 potential phenotypes. The leaf axil, and the maturity B = True branches phenotype provides an overview of the general class Number of Capsules per Leaf appearance of the plant. There is a very high Axil correlation between Maturity Class and Height 1 = Single of Plant (Character No. 5). 3 = Triple Maturity Class V = Very early (<85 days) E = Early (85-94 days) M = Medium (95-104 days) L = Late (105-114 days) T = Very late (>114 days) S29 = B1E for all crops in all nurseries Distribution within Sesaco based on stable lines in the crossing program in 1998-2001 (Total number of samples tested = 650) U1V = 0% U3V = 1.1% U1E = 3.8% U3E = 8.3% U1M = 16.0% U3M = 12.0% U1L = 3.4% U3L = 2.2% U1T = 0.5% U3T = 0.6% BIV = 0% B3V = 0.2% B1E = 8.0% B3E = 6.3% B1M = 23.2% B3M = 4.8% B1L = 6.5% B3L = 1.0% B1T = 1.6% B3T = 0.4% (5) HEIGHT OF Unit of measure: cm The measurement is made after the plants PLANT Values: average of 3 plants stop flowering. For plants that are not erect or The height of the plant S29 = 154 cm in 2004 in have lodged, the plant should be picked up for from the ground to the top Uvalde nursery the measurement. In most lines the highest of the highest capsule Distribution within Sesaco capsule is on the main stem. In lines with the with viable seed based on stable lines in the dt/dt alleles (determinate), the highest capsule crossing program in 1999-2001 is on the branches. (Total number of Comments: this height is dependent on the samples tested = 2274) amount of moisture, heat, fertility, and low = 56 cm; high = 249 cm population. Increased values generally increase 1 = <94.6 cm; 5.2% the height. In a high population, the height will 2 = <133.2 cm; 34.6% only increase if there is adequate fertility and 3 = <171.8 cm; 54.9% moisture; otherwise, the height will be shorter. 4 = <210.4 cm; 5.1% In low light intensities, the heights are 5 = >210.3 cm; 0.1% generally taller. avg. = 134.8 cm, std = 23.5 (6) HEIGHT OF FIRST Unit of measure: cm The measurement is made after the plants CAPSULE Values: average of 3 plants stop flowering. For plants that are not erect or The height of the first S29 = 58 cm in 2004 in have lodged, the plant should be picked up for capsule from the ground Uvalde nursery the measurement. In most lines, the lowest to the bottom of the Distribution within Sesaco capsule is on the main stem. True branches lowest capsule on the based on stable lines in the have capsules higher than on the main stem main stem crossing program in 1999-2001 except when the flowers fall off the main stem. (Total number of Occasionally, on weak branches, the lowest samples tested = 2274) capsule is on the branches. low = 20 cm; high = 193 cm There are lines that flower in the lower 1 = <54.6 cm; 52.7% nodes late in the cycle, and, thus, the measurement 2 = <89.2 cm; 45.5% should be taken after flowering ends. In 3 = <123.8 cm; 1.5% many lines the first flower does not make a 4 = <158.4 cm; 0.3% capsule, and, thus, this height may not be the 5 = >158.3 cm; 0.1% same as the height of the first flower. The avg. = 54.2 cm, std = 14.3 height is correlated to the length of time to flowering, the earlier the lower the height. Comments: see Height of Plant (Character No. 5) for effects of environmental factors (7) CAPSULE ZONE Unit of measure: cm The measurement is derived by subtracting LENGTH Values: average of 3 plants the Height of First Capsule (Character No. 6) The length of the capsule S29 = 97 cm in 2004 in from the Height of Plant (Character No. 5). zone. The capsule zone Uvalde nursery Comments: see Height of Plant (Character extends from the bottom Distribution within Sesaco No. 5) for effects of environmental factors of the lowest capsule on based on stable lines in the the main stem to the top crossing program in 1999-2001 of the highest capsule on (Total number of the main stem. samples tested = 2274) low = 18 cm; high = 188 cm 1 = <52 cm; 4.7% 2 = <86 cm; 53.5% 3 = <120 cm; 41.3% 4 = <154 cm; 0.5% 5 = >153.9 cm; 0.1% avg. = 80.6 cm, std = 17.2 (8) NUMBER OF Unit of measure: number The count is made after the plants stop CAPSULE NODES Values: average of 3 plants flowering. On opposite and alternate arranged The number of capsule S29 = 29 in 2004 in Uvalde leaves, each pair of leaves is counted as one nodes from the lowest nursery node. In some lines, there are three leaves per capsule node to the Distribution within Sesaco node for at least part of the plant. In some highest node with based on stable lines in the plants, flowers may not have produced capsules with viable seed crossing program in 1999-2001 capsules on one or more of the leaf axils in a on the main stem of the (Total number of node. These nodes should still be counted. plant samples tested = 2154) Nodes on the branches are not counted. low = 10; high = 54 In years when the amount of moisture 1 = <18.8; 17.9% available to the plant is irregular, nodes can 2 = <27.6; 48.3% become very irregular, particularly on triple 3 = <36.4; 29.5% capsule lines. In the upper portions of the plant, 4 = <45.2; 3.6% it may become easier to count the capsule 5 = >45.1; 0.7% clusters and divide by 2. While it is possible to avg. = 25.3, std = 6.4 count nodes after leaves have fallen, it is much easier to count while the leaves are still on the plant. Comments: the number of nodes is dependent on the amount of moisture and fertility. Higher moisture and fertility increases the number of nodes. (9) AVERAGE Unit of measure: cm Divide the Capsule Zone Length (Character INTERNODE Values: average of 3 plants No. 7) by the Number of Capsule Nodes LENGTH WITHIN S29 = 3.4 cm in 2004 in (Character No. 8). CAPSULE ZONE Uvalde nursery Comments: this length is dependent on the The average internode Distribution within Sesaco amount of moisture, fertility, and population. length within the capsule based on stable lines in the Increased values generally increase the length. zone crossing program in 1999-2001 In a high population, the length will only (Total number of increase if there is adequate fertility and samples tested = 2145) moisture; otherwise the length will be shorter. low = 1.09 cm; high = 8.09 cm In low light intensities, the lengths are 1 = <2.49 cm; 6.2% generally longer. 2 = <3.89 cm; 74.6% Past methodologies have measured the 3 = <5.29 cm; 18.6% internode length at the middle of the capsule 4 = <6.69 cm; 0.4% zone. Some have measured it at the median 5 = >6.68 cm; 0.1% node and others at the median Capsule Zone avg. = 3.35 cm, std = 0.66 Length. (10) YIELD AT Unit of measure: kg/ha On 3 replicated plots, when the plants are DRYDOWN Values: average of 3 dry enough for direct harvest, cut a minimum An extrapolation of the replications of 1/5000 of a hectare (Sesaco uses 1/2620) in yield of a field by taking S29 = 1,713 kg/ha in 2004 in the plot and place the plants in a cloth bag. sample yields Uvalde nursery; 1,914 in Thresh the sample in a plot thresher and weigh Uvalde commercial; 890 kg/ha the seed. Multiply the weight by the in 2004 in Lorenzo appropriate multiplier based on area taken to nursery^(b) provide the extrapolated yield in kg/ha. Distribution within Sesaco In the Almaco thresher there is about 3% based on stable lines in the trash left in the seed. Since yields are comparative, crossing program in 1999-2001 there is no cleaning of the seed done (Total number of before the computation. If other threshers have samples tested = 1828) more trash, the seed should be cleaned before low = 67 kg/ha weighing. high = 2421 kg/ha Comments: yields increase with moisture 1 = <537.8 kg/ha; 5.6% and fertility. However, too high a moisture can 2 = <1008.6 kg/ha; 15.6% lead to killing of plants. Too high fertility can 3 = <1479.4 kg/ha; 51.5% lead to extra vegetative growth that may not 4 = <1950.2 kg/ha; 25.8% lead to higher yields. The optimum population 5 = >1950.1 kg/ha; 1.4% depends on the Plant Phenotype, Character No. avg. = 1114.6 kg/ha, 4 (Branching Style, Character No. 1; Number std = 331.2 of Capsules per Leaf Axil, Character No. 2; and Maturity Class, Character No. 3) and row width. (11) RESISTANCE TO Subjective rating In a year when there is a drought, this rating DROUGHT Values: 0 to 8 scale can be used to differentiate the effects of the The relative amount of 7 = Little effect from drought different lines. This is a highly subjective resistance to drought 4 = Medium effect from rating requiring a rater that is familiar with the drought performance of the line under normal 1 = Considerable effect from conditions. The rating is based on how the drought drought changes the line from normal. Thus, a Intermediate values are used. short line that does not change significantly in S29 has not been exposed to a drought may have a higher rating than a tall a severe drought to date line which is affected by the drought even Distribution within Sesaco though the taller line is taller in the drought based on stable lines in the than the short line. crossing program in 2000 (Total number of samples tested = 632) low = 0; high = 8 1 = <1.6; 0.8% 2 = <3.2; 28.0% 3 = <4.8; 36.1% 4 = <6.4; 34.5% 5 = >6.3; 0.6% avg. = 4.1, std = 1.2 (12) LEAF LENGTH Unit of measure: cm Select one leaf per node to measure from The length of the leaf Values: average of 3 plants the 5^(th), 10^(th), and 15^(th) nodes from the base of blade from the base of the S29 = 32.7 cm for 5^(th) node the plant. All the leaves for one line should be petiole to the apex of the in 2004 in Uvalde nursery; collected at the same time. Some lines retain leaf from the 5^(th), 10^(th), and 22.8 cm for 10^(th) node in the cotyledons, and the cotyledon node does 15^(th) nodes 2004 in Uvalde nursery; not count as a node. In some lines the lowest and 19.8 cm for 15^(th) node in leaves abscise leaving a scar on the stem. 2004 in Uvalde nursery Abscised nodes should be counted. In lines Distribution within Sesaco with alternate leaves, one node is counted for for 5^(th) leaf based on stable each pair of leaves. In some lines in parts of the lines in the crossing program plant there are three leaves per node which in 2002 (Total number of should be counted as one node. lines tested = 196 with 711 The leaves continue growing in the first few samples) days after they have separated from the low = 13.8 cm; high = 42.5 cm growing tip. The choosing of leaves should be 1 = <19.5 cm; 34.7% done a minimum of 5 days after the 15^(th) node 2 = <25.3 cm; 48.0% has appeared. Timing is important, because the 3 = <31.0 cm; 14.3% plants will begin to shed their lower leaves 4 = <36.8 cm; 1.5% towards the end of their cycle. 5 = >36.7 cm; 1.5% There are lines that have less than 15 nodes. avg. = 21.5 cm, std = 4.4 In this case, the highest node should be taken Distribution within Sesaco and the node number annotated to the for 10^(th) leaf based on stable measurements. lines in the crossing program There can be as much as 6 mm difference in 2002 (Total number of between a green leaf and a dry leaf. The lines tested = 196 with 711 measurements can be done on a green or dry samples) leaf as long as any comparison data with other low = 9.3 cm; high 32.9 cm lines is based on the same method. 1 = <14.0 cm; 22.4% Generally, the lowest leaves increase in size 2 = <18.7 cm; 41.8% until the 4^(th) to 6^(th) node and then they decrease 3 = <23.5 cm; 20.9% in size. This applies to Leaf Length (Character 4 = <28.2 cm; 10.2% No. 12), Leaf Blade Width (Character No. 5 = >28.1 cm; 4.6% 14), and Petiole Length (Character No. 15). In avg. = 17.9 cm, std = 4.8 few cases, Leaf Blade Length Character No. Distribution within Sesaco 13) can increase up the 10^(th) node, but will for 15^(th) leaf based on stable decrease by the 15^(th) node. Generally, the width lines in the crossing program will decrease at a greater rate than the length. in 2002 (Total number of Comments: the length is dependent on the lines tested = 196 with 711 amount of moisture and fertility. Higher samples) moisture and fertility increase the length. Leaf low = 4.4 cm; high = 26.2 cm size also appears to be affected by light 1 = <8.8 cm; 5.1% intensity. In Korea, the Korean lines have 2 = <13.1 cm; 42.9% much larger leaves than in Oklahoma. In 3 = <17.5 cm; 29.8% Korea, there is more cloud cover and a general 4 = <21.8 cm; 15.8% haze than in Oklahoma. 5 = >21.7 cm; 6.6% avg. = 14.3 cm, std = 4.2 (13) LEAF BLADE Unit of measure: cm See Leaf Length (Character No. 12) on how LENGTH Values: average of 3 plants to collect leaves. The measurement does not The length of the leaf S29 = 18.2 cm for 5^(th) node include Petiole Length (Character No. 15). In blade from the base of the in 2004 in Uvalde nursery; some leaves the blade on one side of the petiole leaf blade to the apex of 16.9 cm for 10^(th) node in starts before the other side. This measure the leaf from the 5^(th), 10^(th), 2004 in Uvalde nursery; should start from the lowest blade side. There and 15^(th) nodes and 16.4 cm for 15^(th) node in are leaves that have enations where a blade 2004 in Uvalde nursery starts and then stops. The enations are not Distribution within Sesaco considered part of the leaf blade because they for 5^(th) leaf based on stable are very irregular from plant to plant and lines in the crossing program within a plant. in 2002 (Total number of Comments: see Leaf Length (Character No. lines tested = 196 with 711 12) for effects of environment samples) low = 9.0 cm; high = 25.5 cm 1 = <12.3 cm; 14.3% 2 = <15.6 cm; 60.2% 3 = <18.9 cm; 20.9% 4 = <22.2 cm; 3.1% 5 = >22.1 cm; 1.5% avg. = 14.4 cm, std = 2.4 Distribution within Sesaco for 10^(th) leaf based on stable lines in the crossing program in 2002 (Total number of lines tested = 196 with 711 samples) low = 8.3 cm; high = 23.4 cm 1 = <11.3 cm; 18.9% 2 = <14.3 cm; 42.9% 3 = <17.4 cm; 25.0% 4 = <20.4 cm; 9.2% 5 = >20.3 cm; 4.1% avg. = 13.9 cm, std = 3.0 Distribution within Sesaco for 15^(th) leaf based on stable lines in the crossing program in 2002 (Total number of lines tested = 196 with 711 samples) low = 4.2 cm; high = 20.7 cm 1 = <7.5 cm; 2.0% 2 = <10.8 cm; 36.7% 3 = <14.1 cm; 37.8% 4 = <17.4 cm; 16.3% 5 = >17.3 cm; 7.1% avg. = 12.0 cm, std = 3.0 (14) LEAF BLADE Unit of measure: cm See Leaf Length (Character No. 12) on how WIDTH Values: average of 3 plants to collect leaves. There are many leaves that The width of the leaf S29 = 21.2 cm for 5^(th) node are not symmetrical with lobbing on one side blade measured across the in 2004 in Uvalde nursery; and not the other. The width should still be leaf blade at the widest 5.8 cm for 10^(th) node in 2004 measured across the widest point on a line point at the 5^(th), 10^(th), and in Uvalde nursery; and 3.4 cm perpendicular to the main vein of the leaf. 15^(th) nodes for 15^(th) node in 2004 in On some lines the width exceeds the length, Uvalde nursery particularly on lobed leaves. Distribution within Sesaco Comments: see Leaf Length (Character No. for 5^(th) leaf based on stable 12) for effects of environment lines in the crossing program The widest leaves are lobed. Normally, the in 2002 (Total number of leaves have turned from lobed to lanceolate by lines tested = 196 with 711 the 10^(th) leaf with the exception of the tropical samples) lines. low = 3.4 cm; high 31.0 cm 1 = <8.9 cm; 53.1% 2 = <14.4 cm; 33.7% 3 = <20.0 cm; 9.7% 4 = <25.5 cm; 2.6% 5 = >25.4 cm; 1.0% avg. = 9.6 cm, std = 4.3 Distribution within Sesaco for 10^(th) leaf based on stable lines in the crossing program in 2002 (Total number of lines tested = 196 with 711 samples) low = 1.3 cm; high = 17.6 cm 1 = <4.6 cm; 69.4% 2 = <7.8 cm; 25.0% 3 = <11.1 cm; 4.6% 4 = <14.3 cm; 0% 5 = >14.2 cm; 1.0% avg. = 4.3 cm, std = 2.2 Distribution within Sesaco for 15^(th) leaf based on stable lines in the crossing program in 2002 (Total number of lines tested = 196 with 711 samples) low = 0.7 cm; high = 6.0 cm 1 = <1.8 cm; 29.1% 2 = <2.8 cm; 48.0% 3 = <3.9 cm; 15.3% 4 = <4.9 cm; 4.6% 5 = >4.8 cm; 3.1% avg. = 2.3 cm, std = 0.9 (15) PETIOLE Unit of measure: cm See Leaf Blade Length (Character No. 13) LENGTH Values: average of 3 plants on how to collect leaves. In some leaves, the The length of the petiole S29 = 14.5 cm for 5^(th) node in blade on one side of the petiole starts before from the base of the 2004 in Uvalde nursery; 5.9 cm the other side. This measure should end where petiole to the start of the for 10^(th) node in 2004 in the earliest blade starts. There are leaves that leaf blade at the 5^(th), 10^(th), Uvalde nursery; and 3.4 cm have enations where a blade starts and then and 15^(th) nodes for 15^(th) node in 2004 in stops. The enations are not considered part of Uvalde nursery the leaf blade because they are very irregular Distribution within Sesaco from plant to plant and within a plant and for 5^(th) leaf based on stable should be measured as part of the petiole. lines in the crossing program Comments: see Leaf Length (Character No. in 2002 (Total number of 12) for effects of environment lines tested = 196 with 711 samples) low = 3.0 cm; high = 17.0 cm 1 = <5.8 cm; 35.2% 2 = <8.6 cm; 39.8% 3 = <11.4 cm; 19.4% 4 = <14.2 cm; 4.1% 5 = >14.1 cm; 1.5% avg. = 7.0 cm, std = 2.5 Distribution within Sesaco for 10^(th) leaf based on stable lines in the crossing program in 2002 (Total number of lines tested = 196 with 711 samples) low = 1.0 cm; high = 14.2 cm 1 = <3.6 cm; 53.6% 2 = <6.3 cm; 31.6% 3 = <8.9 cm; 11.7% 4 = <11.6 cm; 2.0% 5 = >11.5 cm; 1.0% avg. = 4.0 cm, std = 2.1 Distribution within Sesaco for 15^(th) leaf based on stable lines in the crossing program in 2002 (Total number of lines tested = 196 with 711 samples) low = 0.2 cm; high = 7.4 cm 1 = <1.6 cm; 38.8% 2 = <3.1 cm; 41.8% 3 = <4.5 cm; 13.3% 4 = <6.0 cm; 3.1% 5 = >5.9 cm; 3.1% avg. = 2.3 cm, std = 1.3 (16) NUMBER OF Unit of measure: Actual The rating can be taken from about 60 days CARPELS PER number after planting to all the way to the end of the CAPSULE Values: crop. The predominant number 2 = bicarpellate There are many plants with mixed number of carpels per capsule in 3 = tricarpellate of carpels as follows: the middle half of the 4 = quadricarpellate 1. Some bicarpellate plants will have one or capsule zone S29 = 2 for all crops in all more nodes near the center of the capsule zone nurseries that have tri- and/or quadricarpellate capsules Distribution within Sesaco and vice versa. based on the introductions 2. Most tri- and quadri-carpellate plants will received in 1982-2001 begin and end with bicarpellate nodes. (Total number of samples 3. Some plants have only one carpel that tested = 2702) develops. These capsules are generally bent, 2 = 97.6% but on examination the 2^(nd) carpel can be seen. 3 = 0.0004% 4. On all types, flowers may coalesce and 4 = 2.3% double or triple the number of carpels. Sesaco has not developed 5. On the seamless gene plants (gs/gs) the lines with more than 2 false membranes do not form locules. These carpels. are still considered bicarpellate. (17) CAPSULE Unit of measure: cm After the plants are physiologically mature, LENGTH FROM Values: taken on the median take 2 capsules from five plants from the 10cap TEST capsule in a 10 capsule middle of the capsule zone. On three capsule The length of the capsule sample per leaf axil lines, one central capsule and one from the bottom of the S29 = 2.78 cm in all 2001-2004 axillary capsule should be taken from the same seed chamber to the top of nurseries leaf axil. The measurement is taken on the the seed chamber from the Distribution within Sesaco median capsule of single capsule lines and on outside of the capsule. based on 10cap test in all the median central capsule on three capsule The tip of the capsule is nurseries in 1997-2002 lines. The measurement is taken on dry not included in the (Total number of lines tested = 1,613 capsules because the length can shorten as measurement. with 8,285 samples) much as one mm on drydown. low = 1.3 cm; high = 4.5 cm The 10 capsules can be sampled from 1 = <1.94 cm; 2.7% physiological maturity through complete 2 = <2.58 cm; 67.9% drydown without an effect on this character. 3 = <3.22 cm; 27.2% Generally, the capsules in the middle of the 4 = <3.86 cm; 1.9% capsule zone are the longest on the plant. 5 = >3.85 cm; 0.3% Comments: the length of the capsule is avg. = 2.44 cm, std = 0.33 dependent on the amount of moisture, fertility, and population. Higher moisture and fertility increase the length. Higher population decreases the length even with adequate moisture/fertility. (18) SEED WEIGHT Unit of measure: grams See Capsule Length from 10cap Test PER CAPSULE Values: average of 10 (Character No. 17) for collection of capsules. FROM 10cap TEST capsules The capsules should be dried, the seed threshed The weight of the seed in S29 = 0.235 g in all 2001-2004 out, and the seed weighed. a capsule from the center nurseries The 10 capsules can be sampled from of the capsule zone Distribution within Sesaco physiological maturity through complete based on 10cap test in all drydown without an effect on this character. nurseries in 1997-2002 After drydown, only capsules with all their (Total number of lines tested = 1,613 seed are taken. Thus, this test cannot be done with 8,285 samples) on shattering lines after drydown. low = 0.053 g; high = 0.476 g Generally, the capsules in the middle of the 1 = <0.138 g; 1.3% capsule zone have the highest seed weight per 2 = <0.222 g; 47.6% capsule on the plant. 3 = <0.307 g; 50.6% Comments: see Capsule Length from 10cap 4 = <0.391 g; 1.1% Test (Character No. 17) for the effects of 5 = >0.390 g; 0.1% environmental factors. avg. = 0.221 g, std = 0.039 (19) CAPSULE Unit of measure: grams See Capsule Length from 10cap Test WEIGHT PER Values: average of 10 (Character No. 17) for collection of capsules. CAPSULE FROM capsules The capsules should be dried, the seed threshed 10cap TEST S29 = 0.163 g in all 2001-2004 out, and the capsules weighed. At times the The weight of the capsule nurseries peduncle can still be attached to the capsules. from the center of the Distribution within Sesaco The peduncles should be removed and not capsule zone after the based on 10cap test in all weighed. seed has been removed nurseries in 1997-2002 The 10 capsules can be sampled from (Total number of lines tested = 1,613 physiological maturity through complete with 8,285 samples) drydown without an effect on this character. low = 0.059 g; high = 0.395 g Generally, the capsules in the middle of the 1 = <0.126 g; 22.6% capsule zone have the highest capsule weight 2 = <0.193 g; 69.1% per capsule on the plant. 3 = <0.261 g; 8.2% Comments: see Capsule Length from 10cap 4 = <0.328 g; 0.9% Test (Character No. 17) for the effects of 5 = >0.327 g; 0.6% environmental factors. avg. = 0.152 g, std = 0.036 (20) CAPSULE Unit of measure: grams The weight is derived by dividing the WEIGHT PER CM Values: average of 10 Capsule Weight per Capsule from 10cap Test OF CAPSULE capsules (Character No. 19) by the Capsule Length from The weight of a capsule S29 = 0.059 g in all 2001-2004 10cap Test (Character No. 17). per cm of capsule from nurseries The 10 capsules can be sampled from the center of the capsule Distribution within Sesaco physiological maturity through complete zone based on 10cap test in all drydown without an effect on this character. nurseries in 1997-2002 Comments: this character is used instead of (Total number of lines tested = 1,613 capsule width. Capsule width is difficult to with 8,285 samples) measure because there are so many variables in low = 0.027 g; high = 0.123 g a capsule. In a bicarpellate capsule, the width 1 = <0.046 g; 8.2% differs when measuring across one carpel or 2 = <0.065 g; 55.5% both carpels. Capsules can also vary through 3 = <0.085 g; 36.5% the length of the capsule by being substantially 4 = <0.104 g; 4.4% narrower at the bottom, middle or top of the 5 = >0.103 g; 0.5% capsule. In 1997, four widths were measured avg. = 0.063 g, std = 0.012 on each capsule and then averaged. This average had a very high correlation to the capsule weight per cm of capsule. See Capsule Length from 10cap Test (Character No. 17) for effects of environmental factors (21) VISUAL SEED Subjective rating When the plants in a plot are dry below RETENTION Values: where the cutter bar would hit the plant, assign Amount of seed in most of Seed Retention a rating based on the following guidelines. If the capsules in the middle 8 = 100% just identifying lines for further testing, use half of the capsule zone 6 = 75% V/X/W ratings. If identifying lines to use in a when the plant(s) are dry 4 = 50% crossing program to improve seed retention, enough for direct harvest 2 = 25% use 0-8 ratings. Ratings 6-8 can be seen with a combine 0 = 0% without removing the capsule from the plant. Intermediate values can be For the other ratings, the capsules must be used. opened. Rating is an overall subjective number V = >74% seed retention since retention can vary from plant to plant and (sufficient seed retention for even within a plant. 10cap testing) The effects of the environment are not fully X = <75% seed retention known. There are indications that in drought (unsuitable for direct harvest) or very low fertility conditions, there is less W = >74% seed retention seed retention. When high populations lead to on weathering in field after low moisture or fertility, there is less seed rains and/or winds for more retention. From normal conditions through than 3 weeks following high moisture/fertility conditions, there does complete drydown not appear to be an appreciable difference. S29 = W for all crops in all nurseries (22) SHAKER Unit of measure: Actual See Capsule Length from 10cap Test SHATTER Number expressed as (Character No. 17) for collection of capsules. RESISTANCE percentage The capsules should be dried and inverted. The FROM 10cap TEST Values: average of 10 capsules and any seed that has fallen out The amount of seed retention capsules should then be placed in flasks on a reciprocal after the capsules are S29 = 76.1% in all 2001-2004 shaker with a 3.8 cm stroke with 250 dry, inverted, and put nurseries strokes/min for 10 minutes (see U.S. Pat. through a shaker Distribution within Sesaco No. 6,100,452). The seed that comes out of the based on 10cap test in all capsules should be weighed as ‘out seed.’ The nurseries in 1997-2002 retained seed should be threshed out of the (Total number of lines tested = 1,613 capsules and weighed to compute the ‘total with 8,285 samples) seed’. The shaker shatter resistance is low = 0; high = 100 computed as a percentage as follows: (total 1 = <20; 12.9% seed − out seed)/total seed. 2 = <40; 6.9% The 10 capsules can be sampled from 3 = <60; 23.4% physiological maturity through complete 4 = <80; 47.7% drydown without an effect on this character for 5 = >79.9; 9.2% shatter resistant types. When taking capsules avg. = 55.9%, std = 23.9 after drydown, only capsules with all their seed are taken. Thus, this test cannot be done on shattering lines after drydown. Comments: there are indications that in drought or very low fertility condition, there is less seed retention. When high populations lead to low moisture or fertility, there is less seed retention. From normal conditions through high moisture/fertility conditions, there does not appear to be an appreciable difference in seed retention. Lines with shaker shatter resistance >64.9% are known as non-dehiscent lines (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,100,452). (23) CAPSULE Subjective rating The rating is based on visual seed retention SHATTERING Values: and other visual observations. The plants TYPE SUS = Super-shattering (<2 remain standing in the field without shocking. Amount of seed retention visual seed retention - GS plants can be identified while the plant in a line or plant equates to <25%) is putting on capsules or at drydown because SHA = Shattering (<4 visual the carpels in the capsules do not form false seed retention - equates to membranes. There are plants that will have <50%) capsules with false membranes on the lower SSH = Semi-shattering (4-6 and upper nodes but most of the capsules show visual seed retention - no false membranes. equates to 50 to 75%) ID plants can be identified during the SR = Shatter resistant (>6 growing season in that they have enations on visual seed retention without the bottoms of the leaves. At dry down they are id or gs alleles - equates to more difficult to distinguish from other lines >75%) that have closed capsules (other than GS). ID = Indehiscent (presence There is less of a suture than other capsule of id/id with capsule closed) types. IDO = Indehiscent (presence SUS, SHA, SSH, and SR are defined by of id/id with capsule open at Visual Seed Retention (Character No. 21). tip) Comments: most environmental factors do GS = Seamless (presence of not have much of an effect on capsule gs/gs with capsule closed) shattering type other than to make it more GSO = Seamless (presence of difficult to distinguish in the overlap zone. gs/gs with capsule open at Generally, higher moisture, higher fertility, and tip) lower populations will decrease the shattering a S29 = SR in all crops in all small amount - less than 10%. nurseries The wind can have a large effect in decreasing the amount of seed retention. Rain, dew and fog can also reduce seed retention. (24) NON-DEHISCENT Rating Lines are designated as ND only after they TEST Values: have undergone a minimum of 3 shaker shatter A line that has passed the ND = Non-dehiscent line resistance tests. In order to be considered an non-dehiscent test of XX = Line that does not ND variety, the line must pass the ND having shaker shatter pass the non-dehiscent test threshold in multiple nurseries for multiple resistance >64.9%. ND S29 = ND for all crops in all years. For example, S29 has a mean of 75.4% lines should not have id or nurseries seed retention in 85 shaker shatter resistance gs alleles. Distribution within Sesaco tests for 2000-2004. based on 10cap test in all nurseries in 1997-2001 (Total number of samples tested = 3031) ND = 56.8% XX = 43.2% (25) DAYS TO Unit of measure: days This data is taken as a date and later FLOWERING Values: number of days converted to number of days. Flowering is Number of days from S29 = 40 days in 2004 in defined as flowers that are open - not buds. planting until 50% of the Uvalde nursery This is a somewhat subjective unit of plants are flowering Distribution within Sesaco measure because there is little difference in the based on lines in Uvalde appearance of a line that has 40% and a line nursery in 2000-2001 that has 60% of plants with flowers. In (Total number of samples addition, the plots are not walked every day, tested = 1831) and thus there is an estimate that the plot was low = 33 days; high = 89 days 50% a few days before or after the date of data 1 = <44.2 days; 87.9% collection. 2 = <55.4 days; 7.8% Comments: flowering can be accelerated 3 = <66.6 days; 2.4% by drought and it can be delayed by higher 4 = <77.8 days; 1.7% moisture and/or fertility. Higher heat units will 5 = >77.7 days; 0.2% decrease the days to flowering. avg. = 40.9 days, std = 6.3 Some lines are photosensitive and will only begin flowering at a certain number of hours of daylight. Start of flowering does not always equate to start of capsule formation. Many lines will flower and not set capsules from the first flowers. (26) DAYS TO Unit of measure: days This data is taken as a date and later FLOWER Values: number of days converted to number of days. Flowering is TERMINATION S29 = 82 days in 2004 in defined as flowers that are open - not buds. At Number of days from Uvalde nursery the end of the flowering period, the rate that a planting until 90% of the Distribution within Sesaco plant puts on open flowers is reduced. Thus, plants have stopped based on lines in Uvalde there can be more than 10% of plants with buds flowering nursery in 2000-2001 and still have reached this measure since there (Total number of samples will not be more than 10% with open flowers tested = 2668) on any one day. low = 61 days; high = 114 days This is a somewhat subjective unit of 1 = <71.6 days; 21.1% measure because there is little difference in the 2 = <82.2 days; 61.5% appearance of a line that has 85% and a line 3 = <92.8 days; 15.9% that has 95% of plants with no flowers. In 4 = <103.4 days; 0.8% addition, the plots are not walked every day, 5 = >103.3 days; 0.8% and thus there is an estimate that the plot was avg. = 77.1 days, std = 6.9 90% a few days before or after the date of data collection. Another problem is that under low moisture conditions the plots can reach the 90% mark only to begin flowering again after a rain. In those cases the data is adjusted to the later number of days. The measure is based on the number of plants and not the number of flowering heads. The branches will stop flowering before the main stem, and thus the plot will appear like there are more plants not flowering. Comments: flower termination can be accelerated by lower moisture and/or fertility, and it can be delayed by higher moisture and/or fertility. Higher heat units will decrease the Days to Flower Termination. It is known that there are lines that stop flowering sooner than expected in northern latitudes, but it is not known if this is due to shorter photoperiod or cool temperatures. (27) DAYS TO Unit of measure: days This data is taken as a date and later PHYSIOLOGICAL Values: number of days converted to number of days. Physiological MATURITY S29 = 94 days in 2001-2004 maturity (PM) is defined as the point at which Number of days from in Uvalde nursery ¾ of the capsules have seed with final color. planting until 50% of the S29 = 102 in 2004 in Uvalde In most lines, the seed will also have a seed plants reach physiological nursery line and tip that are dark. maturity Distribution within Sesaco This is a somewhat subjective unit of based on lines in Uvalde measure because there is little difference in the nursery in 2000-2001 appearance of a line that has 40% and a line (Total number of samples that has 60% of plants with PM. In addition, tested = 2374) the plots are not walked every day, and thus low = 77 days; high = 140 days there is an estimate that the plot was 50% a few 1 = <89.6 days; 16.8% days before or after the date of data collection. 2 = 102.2 days; 58.0% Comments: The concept of physiological 3 = <114.8 days; 23.6% maturity in sesame was developed by M. L. Kinman 4 = <127.4 days; 1.4% (personal communication) based on 5 = >127.3 days; 0.2% the concept of determining the optimum time avg. = 97.1 days, std = 7.1 to cut a plant and still harvest 95-99% of the potential yield. When the seed has final color, the seed can germinate under the proper conditions. If the plant is cut at physiological maturity, most of the seed above the ¾ mark will go to final color and are mature enough to germinate, but will not have as much seed weight. Since in even a fully mature plant, there is less seed weight made at the top of the plant, this loss of seed weight does not seriously affect the potential seed weight of the plant. Although present harvest methods let the plants mature and go to complete drydown, PM is important because after that point, the crop is less susceptible to yield loss due to frost or disease. The PM is also important if the crop is to be swathed or dessicants are to be applied. Physiological maturity can be accelerated by lower moisture and/or fertility, and it can be delayed by higher moisture and/or fertility. Higher heat units will decrease the days to physiological maturity. Cool weather can delay physiological maturity. (28) SEED COLOR Subjective rating This data is taken in the laboratory with the The color of the seed coat Values: same lighting for all samples. The seed from WH = White the whole plant is used. BF = Buff Seed coat color is taken on mature seeds. If TN = Tan there is any abnormal termination, the colors LBR = Light brown are not quite as even. The color of immature GO = Gold seed varies. Usually light seeded lines have tan LGR = Light gray to light brown immature seed; tan, light brown, GR = Gray gold, brown light gray, and gray lines have BR = Brown lighter immature seed; black lines can have tan, RBR = Reddish brown brown, or gray immature seed. BL = Black Usually, moisture, fertility, population and S29 = BF in all crops in all light intensity do not have an effect on seed nurseries coat color. Light colored seeds in a drought Distribution within Sesaco may have a yellowish tinge. Seeds in some based on seed harvested in all lines in the tan, light brown and gold range can nurseries in 1982-2001 (Total change from year to year among themselves. number of samples tested = 161,809) WH = 0.8% BF = 74.8% TN = 9.0% LBR = 1.4% GO = 1.5% LGR = 0.6% GR = 1.4% BR = 6.5% RBR = 0.6% BL = 3.5% (29) SEED WEIGHT - Unit of measure: grams See Capsule Length from 10cap Test 100 SEEDS FROM Values: average of 3 samples (Character No. 17) for collection of capsules. 10cap TEST^(c) S29 = 0.332 g in 2001-2004 Count out 100 seeds and weigh. The seed Weight of 100 seeds taken in Uvalde nursery must be dry. from the 10cap tests Distribution within Sesaco Comments: the weight increases with which are taken from the based on stable lines in all higher moisture/fertility. Generally, the weight middle of the plant. nurseries in 1997-2002 of the seed from the whole plant is lighter than (Total number of lines tested = 820 the seed weight taken from the 10cap test. with 2,899 samples) low = 0.200 g; high = 0.455 g 1 = <0..251 g; 10.1% 2 = <0.302 g; 48.4% 3 = <0.353 g; 34.0% 4 = <0.404 g; 7.2% 5 = >0.403 g; 0.2% avg. = 0.298 g, std = 0.04 (30) UVALDE KILL Subjective rating On the week a plot reaches PM, a rating is RESISTANCE Values: ratings are based on assigned. The ratings are then taken for 2 The amount of plants the number of plants killed in additional weeks. The three ratings are killed by root rots in the a plot. Before physiological averaged for a final kill rating. For example, if Sesaco nurseries in maturity (PM), the following a plot has a final kill of 766, the average for the Uvalde, TX ratings are used: plot will be 6.33. When a value of 1 or 2 is 1 = >90% kill before Days to assigned, there are no additional ratings and Flowering Termination there is no averaging. (Character No. 26) There are three root diseases that affect 2 = >90% kill between Days sesame in Texas: Fusarium oxysporum, to Flowering Termination Macrophomina phaseoli, and Phytophtora (Character No. 26) and Days parasitica. Between 1988 and the present, to Physiological Maturity spores of these three have been accumulated in (Character No. 27) one small area (1 square km) north of Uvalde, After PM, the following and thus it is an excellent screening area for the ratings are used: diseases. Although each root rot attacks sesame 3 = >90% kill in a different way with different symptoms, no 4 = 50 to 89% kill effort is made to differentiate which disease is 5 = 25 to 49% kill the culprit in each plot. Pathological screenings 6 = 10 to 24% kill in the past have found all 3 pathogens present 7 = less than 10% kill in dead plants. 8 = no kill Comments: normally, the ratings will S29 = 7.00 in 2004 in decrease a maximum of one value per week. Uvalde nursery There is an overlap between any two ratings, Distribution within Sesaco but this is overcome to a certain extent by based on lines in Uvalde using three ratings over 2 weeks. nursery in 2000-2001 The amount of kill is usually increased with (Total number of samples any type of stress to the plants. Drought can tested = 3045) increase the amount of Macrophomina; too low = 1.00; high = 8.00 much water can increase the amount of 1 = <1.6; 1.7% Phytophtora; high temperatures and humidity 2 = <3.2; 16.7% can increase the amount of Fusarium and 3 = <4.8; 38.7% Phytophtora. High population can increase all 4 = <6.4; 31.2% three diseases. 5 = >6.3; 11.6% The ratings for any one year can be used to avg. = 4.52, std = 1.49 compare lines grown in that year, but should not be used to compare lines grown in different years. The amount of disease in any one year is highly dependent on moisture, humidity, and temperatures. (31) RESISTANCE TO Subjective rating Ratings can be done in several ways: FUSARIUM WILT Values: 0 to 8 scale 1. Take ratings after the disease is no longer (F. oxysporum) % of infected plants increasing Amount of resistance to 8 = Zero disease 2. Take ratings on consecutive weeks until Fusarium wilt 7 = <10% infected disease is no longer increasing and average 4 = 50% infected ratings. 1 = >90% infected 3. Take periodic ratings and average ratings. 0 = all infected Comments: Fusarium has been a problem NT = not tested in South Texas, particularly on fields that have NEC = no economic been planted with sesame before. Normally, damage - not enough disease only the Uvalde Kill Resistance (Character No. to do ratings 30) rating is taken. S29 = 7 in 2004 in Uvalde nursery (32) RESISTANCE TO Subjective rating See Methodology for Resistance to Fusarium PHYTOPHTORA See Values for Fusarium Wilt (Character No. 31) STEM ROT (P. parasitica) S29 = NT Comments: Phytophtora has been a Amount of resistance to problem in Arizona and Texas, particularly on Phytophtora stem rot fields that have been over-irrigated. Normally, only the Uvalde Kill Resistance (Character No. 30) rating is taken. (33) RESISTANCE TO Subjective rating See Methodology for Resistance to Fusarium CHARCOAL ROT See Values for Fusarium Wilt (Character No. 31) (Macrophomina S29 = NT Comments: Macrophomina has been a phaseoli) problem in Arizona and Texas, particularly on Amount of resistance to fields that go into a drought. Normally, only Charcoal rot the Uvalde Kill Resistance (Character No. 30) rating is taken. (34) RESISTANCE TO Subjective rating See Methodology for Resistance to Fusarium BACTERIAL Values: 0 to 8 scale Wilt (Character No. 31) BLACK ROT % of infected leaves Comments: this disease occurs occasionally (Pseudomonas 8 = Zero disease when there is continual rainy weather with few sesami) 7 = <10% infected clouds. In most years, the disease abates once Amount of resistance to 4 = 50% infected the weather changes. No economic damage has bacterial black rot 1 = >90% infected been noticed. 0 = all infected NT = not tested NEC = no economic damage - not enough disease to do ratings S29 = 7.97 in 2004 in Uvalde nursery Distribution within Sesaco based on lines in Uvalde nursery in 2004 (Total number of samples tested = 593) low = 4.00; high = 8.00 1 = <2.4; 0.0% 2 = <3.8; 0.0% 3 = <5.2; 8.6% 4 = <6.6; 16.0% 5 = >6.5; 75.4% avg. = 7.13, std = 1.00 (35) RESISTANCE TO Subjective rating Ratings can be done in several ways: SILVERLEAF Values: 0 to 8 scale 1. Take ratings after the insects are no longer WHITE FLY 8 = Zero insects increasing. (Bemisia argentifolii) 7 = Few insects 2. Take ratings on consecutive weeks until Amount of resistance to 4 = Many insects insects are no longer increasing and average the silverleaf white fly 1 = Insects killing the plants ratings. NT = not tested 3. Take periodic ratings and average ratings. NEC = no economic Comments: there have been very few years damage - not enough insects (1991-1995) where the incidence of silverleaf to do ratings white fly has affected nurseries or commercial S29 = NEC in 2004 in crops. In most years, a few white flies can be Yuma nursery^(d) seen in the sesame with no economic damage. In the middle 1990s, the USDA began introducing natural predators of the silverleaf white fly in the Uvalde area. It is not known if the predators reduced the effects of the white fly or there is a natural tolerance to white fly in the current varieties. Higher temperatures decrease the number of days between generations. There are indications that higher moisture and fertility increase the incidence of white flies, but there is no definitive data. The sweet potato white fly (Bemisia tabaci) has been observed in nurseries since 1978 without any economic damage. (36) RESISTANCE TO Subjective rating See Methodology for Resistance to Silverleaf GREEN PEACH See Values for White Fly White Fly (Character No. 35) APHIDS (Myzus S29 = 7.98 in 2004 in Comments: there have been very few years persicae) Uvalde nursery (1990-1995) where the incidence of green Amount of resistance to Distribution within Sesaco peach aphid has affected nurseries or the green peach aphid based on lines in Uvalde commercial crops. In most years, a few aphids nursery in 2004 can be seen in the sesame with no economic (Total number of samples damage. There have been many years in West tested = 412) Texas when the cotton aphid has decimated the low = 1.00; high = 8.00 cotton and did not build up on adjacent sesame 1 = <2.4; 1.0% fields. 2 = <3.8; 0.5% Higher moisture and fertility increase the 3 = <5.2; 10.7% susceptibility to aphids. 4 = <6.6; 4.8% 5 = >6.5; 83.0% avg. = 7.04, std = 1.35 (37) RESISTANCE TO Subjective rating See Methodology for Resistance to Silverleaf POD BORERS See Values for White Fly White Fly (Character No. 35) (Heliothis spp.) S29 = NT Comments: there have been very few years Amount of resistance to (1985) where the incidence of Heliothis has pod borers affected nurseries or commercial crops. In most years, a few borers can be seen in the sesame with no economic damage. (38) RESISTANCE TO Subjective rating See Methodology for Resistance to Silverleaf ARMY WORMS See Values for White Fly White Fly (Character No. 35) (Spodoptera spp.) S29 = NT Comments: there have been very few years Amount of resistance to (1984-1987) where the incidence of army worms Spodoptera has affected commercial crops in Arizona. In Texas, army worms have decimated cotton and alfalfa fields next to sesame without any damage to the sesame. It is not known if the Arizona army worm is different from the Texas army worm. (39) RESISTANCE TO Subjective rating See Methodology for Resistance to Silverleaf CABBAGE See Values for White Fly White Fly (Character No. 35) LOOPERS (Pieris S29 = NT Comments: there have been very few years rapae) (1992-1993) where the incidence of cabbage Amount of resistance to loopers has affected nurseries. In commercial cabbage loopers sesame, cabbage loopers have been observed with no economic damage. ^(a)Uvalde nursery as described above. ^(b)Lorenzo nursery as described above. ^(c)In previous reports, the 100 seed weight was taken from the whole plant. The data for the whole plant can be inconsistent since it may reflect either single plant selections, best bulk plants, or all the plants in a segment of the plot. The seed weight from an entire segment of a plot or field is generally lower than the single or bulk plant selections by 0.01 to 0.02 grams because plants below the canopy are included in the sample. In 1998, there was an experiment on 53 lines, which took the 100 seed weight from 5 different segments of three plants and from the whole plant. The average difference between the middle section and the whole plant was 0.006 g. From 2002 onward, the data has been taken from the 10cap test instead of the whole plant. The sample sizes from the 10cap testing are much larger than the sample sizes from the whole plant. ^(d)Yuma nursery as described above.

In developing sesame varieties for the United States, there are five major characters that are critical: Shaker Shatter Resistance (Character No. 22), Uvalde Kill Resistance (Character No. 30), Days to Physiological Maturity (Character No. 27), Seed Color (Character No. 28), and Seed Weight—100 Seeds from 10cap test (Character No. 29). The first three characters contribute to yield which is the ultimate determinant for the farmer to grow a variety. In improving the characters, the yields have to be comparable to or better than current varieties, or provide a beneficial improvement for a particular geographical or market niche. Shaker Shatter Resistance determines how well the plants will retain the seed while they are drying down in adverse weather. Uvalde Kill Resistance determines whether the plants can finish their cycle and have the optimum seed fill. Days to Physiological Maturity determines how far north and to which elevation the varieties can be grown. In the United States and Europe, the Seed Color is important since over 95% of the market requires white or buff seed. There are limited markets for gold and black seed in the Far East. All other colors can only be used in the oil market. Seed Weight—100 Seeds from 10cap test determines the market for the seed. Lack of Uvalde Kill Resistance can reduce Seed Weight—100 Seeds from 10cap test. In parts of the United States where there is little rain in dry years Resistance to Drought (Character No. 11) becomes important in reducing yield and seed weight. There has not been a drought in nurseries planted since 2000.

There are other characters important in developing commercial sesame varieties explained in Langham, D. R. and T. Wiemers, 2002, “Progress in mechanizing sesame in the US through breeding”, In: J. Janick (ed.), Trends in new crops and new uses, ASHS Press, Alexandria, Va. Branching Style (Character No. 1), Height of Plant (Character No. 5) and Height of First Capsule (Character No. 6) are important in combining. Capsule Zone Length (Character No. 7), Number of Capsule Nodes (Character No. 8), Average Internode Length within Capsule Zone (Character No. 9), and Seed Weight per Capsule (Character No. 18) are important in creating potential Yield at Drydown (Character No. 10). Leaf dimensions (Characters No. 12, 13, 14, and 15) are important in determining optimum populations. Number of Capsules per Leaf Axil (Character No. 2), Number of Carpels per Capsule (Character No. 16), Capsule Length (Character No. 17), Capsule Weight per Capsule (Character No. 19), and Capsule Weight per cm of Capsule (Character No. 20) are important in breeding for Visual Seed Retention (Character No. 21) which leads to testing for Shaker Shatter Resistance (Character No. 22) and determining the Capsule Shattering Type (Character No. 23). Days to Flowering (Character No. 25), Days to Flower Termination (Character No. 26), and Days to Physiological Maturity (Character No. 27) are highly correlated and important in determining the geographical range for the variety. In the United States, resistance to diseases and pests (Characters No. 31 to 39) are critical to allow the crop to reach maturity and harvest.

FIG. 2 provides the Shaker Shatter Resistance (Character No. 22) of all the varieties released by Sesaco since 1981. The figures are the mean from all testing in all nurseries from 1997 to 2004. S01 was an indehiscent variety with excellent seed retention, but the seed could not be threshed out without making the seed unmarketable. S02 through S10, S12, and S14 were developed for swathing at physiological maturity, drying in windrows, and then picking up with a combine. All of these varieties had good yields when there was little rain and high temperatures at harvest time. In the bad weather, the yields were reduced. Attempts were made to let these varieties dry down standing and then combining, but the yields were not commercially adequate. S11 was the first variety that could be left standing for harvest with adequate yields in normal weather. With the exception of S17, varieties S15 through S22 were released for specific niches. S17 replaced S11 in most locations until it was replaced by S23 and S24. In 2001, S25 replaced S23. S23 is considered to be the minimum acceptable Shaker Shatter Resistance for commercial use. S24, S25, S26, S28, and S29 all have Shaker Shatter Resistance in the low to mid seventy percent level, which is considered the optimum level. There are some disadvantages associated with higher Shaker Shatter Resistance ratings: (1) capsules that have smaller openings at the top of the capsule can have a higher Shaker Shatter Resistance rating but the smaller opening can also result in mold in hot humid conditions, and (2) capsules that have a higher Shaker Shatter Resistance rating may require more force in the combine to release the seed from the capsules resulting in seed damage.

FIG. 3 provides the Uvalde Kill Resistance (Character No. 30) of all the varieties released by Sesaco since 1981 as compared in the Uvalde nursery in 2004. The ratings in this figure are lower than in previous reports because environmental conditions fostered more severe root rots. Uvalde Kill Resistance is a composite rating of resistance to three root rots: Fusarium, Phytophtora, and Macrophomina. In most years, Fusarium is the major cause of kill. When sesame is first introduced into a growing area, there are few disease problems, but over time the spores of these fungi accumulate and disease resistance becomes critical. When sesame was first introduced in Uvalde in 1988, the yields were high. As farmers planted on the same fields in subsequent years, the yields decreased. S11 was very susceptible to these root rots, and thus, it was replaced by S17, which was subsequently replaced by S23 and S24. In 2001, S25 replaced S23. S26 and S28 were an improvement over S24 and S25, and S29 has comparable kill resistance to S26 and S28.

FIG. 4 provides the mean Days to Physiological Maturity (Character No. 27) of all the varieties in 1998-2004 in the Uvalde nursery. In the United States, sesame is currently grown from South Texas to southern Kansas. The growing window of a crop is determined by the earliest the crop can be planted in the spring as the ground warms up, and the onset of cold weather in the fall. Current sesame varieties require about 21° C. ground temperature to establish an adequate population. In most years, the ground is warm enough in South Texas in middle April and in southern Kansas in late May. Current sesame varieties require night temperatures above 5° C. for normal termination. In most years, the night temperatures are warm enough in South Texas until middle November and in southern Kansas until middle October. There have been years when cold fronts affect the growth of sesame in the middle of September in the north. East of Lubbock, Tex., the elevations begin climbing towards the Rocky Mountains, and there are later warm temperatures in the spring and earlier cold temperatures in the fall. In all years, if the sesame is planted as early as temperatures allow, lines with Days to Physiological Maturity of 105 days or less will have no problems. However, most areas are rainfed, and it is essential to have a planting rain before planting the sesame. Thus, the earlier the Days to Physiological Maturity of the variety, the more flexibility the farmers have with planting date. In South Texas, the goal is to have varieties with a Days to Physiological Maturity of less than 110 days while in southern Kansas the goal is less than 90 days. The mean Days to Physiological Maturity for S29 in 1998-2004 was 94 days, which allows sesame to be planted further north and at higher elevations.

FIG. 5 provides the average Seed Weight—100 Seeds from the 10cap test (Character No. 29) of all varieties between 1997 and 2004. The hulled market is the premium use of sesame in the United States and Europe. In recent years, hulled sesame processors have been increasing the specifications of Seed Weight—100 Seeds from the 10cap test to between 0.31 and 0.33 g, and larger seed is preferable for hulled products used on top of breads and buns. To date, the Sesaco varieties with the highest Seed Weight—100 Seeds from the 10cap test have had marginal Shaker Shatter Resistance (Character No. 22) and poor Uvalde Kill Resistance (Character No. 30). Some markets have no specifications on seed weight, but larger seed is still desirable. The mean Seed Weight—100 Seeds from the 10cap test for S29 for all years is smaller than S26 and S28, and larger than S24 and S25, and meets the specifications for hulled sesame.

Prior to 1988, all of the commercial sesame in the United States was grown in Arizona. S01 through S10, S12, and S14 were specifically developed for Arizona From 1988 to 1991, there was a transition from Arizona to Texas. In 1996, sesame spread into Oklahoma, and in 1998, into Kansas. In introducing sesame to Texas, the swathing technology was tried on S07 and S10, but farmers did not have the proper equipment; the plants fell into the furrows and could not be picked up; and/or blowing sand covered parts of the windrows. S11 was the first variety that could be combined directly, and S11 persisted until 1995. However, in addition to being susceptible to root rots, S11 was also susceptible to pests such as green peach aphids (Myzus persicae) (Character No. 36) and silverleaf white fly (Bemisia argentifolii) (Character No. 35), and S11 had too long a Days to Physiological Maturity (Character No. 27) for West Texas. S15 was introduced for West Texas, but shorter Days to Physiological Maturity was still not early enough and the Shaker Shatter Resistance (Character No. 22) was not adequate. S16 was released specifically because it was tolerant to the white fly, but it did not have good Shaker Shatter Resistance or Uvalde Kill Resistance (Character No. 30), and it was susceptible to lodging. S17 had better Uvalde Kill Resistance, aphid resistance, and white fly resistance than S11. With an earlier Days to Physiological Maturity, S17 was the first variety that was suitable for West Texas and southern Kansas; however, S17 was susceptible to lodging. S18 and S21 were released for flavor for the Japanese organic market. S19 had improved lodging resistance over S17, but the yields in non-windy areas were not as good as S17. S20 and S22 were released because of excellent drought resistance. In the rainfed areas of Central Texas, the yields of S20 and S22 were higher than S17, the large seed was desirable to processors, and no root rots had been seen. However, the root rot spores began accumulating, and the S20 and S22 had to be discontinued. S24 replaced S17 based on higher Shaker Shatter Resistance, better Uvalde Kill Resistance, shorter Days to Physiological Maturity, and larger Seed Weight—100 Seeds from 10cap test (Character No.29). S23 was used in southern Kansas and northern Oklahoma because of a shorter Days to Physiological Maturity than S24, but the Seed Weight—100 Seeds from 10cap test was marginal. S25 replaced S23 in southern Kansas and northern Oklahoma because of comparable Days to Physiological Maturity and Uvalde Kill Resistance. Compared to S23, S25 has better Shaker Shatter Resistance, but the major reason for the replacement is the Seed Weight—100 Seeds from 10cap test. S26 was developed for its Resistance to Drought (Character No.11) which was much better than S24 and S25. Compared to S24 and S25, S26 has comparable Shaker Shatter Resistance, better Uvalde Kill Resistance, and better Seed Weight—100 Seeds from 10cap test. In terms of the Days to Physiological Maturity S26 takes longer to mature than the current varieties. As a result, there is a limit to the geographical range of S26 to the north. S28 was selected specifically to provide a large seeded variety that could be planted further north than S26. Compared to S26, S28 has about the same Shaker Shatter Resistance, slightly better Uvalde Kill Resistance, and slightly lower Seed Weight—100 Seeds from 10cap test.

S29 is an intermediate between two pairs of varieties: S24/S25 and S26/S28. In terms of the five major characters that are critical: Days to Physiological Maturity (Character No.27), Shaker Shatter Resistance (Character No.22), Uvalde Kill Resistance (Character No.30), Seed Color (Character No.28), and Seed Weight—100 Seeds from 10cap test (Character No.29), S29 is earlier than S26/S28 and later than S24/S25, has comparable shatter resistance to the other lines, has much better kill resistance than S24/S25 and comparable kill resistance to S26/S28, has buff seed color like the other varieties, and has higher seed weight than S24/S25 and less seed weight than S26/S28.

Over the past 27 years, Sesaco has tested 2,920 introductions from all over the world. Commercial samples have been obtained from China, India, Sudan, Ethiopia, Burkina Faso, Nigeria, Mozambique, Pakistan, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Egypt, Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Thailand, Turkey, Upper Volta, Uganda, Mali, Kenya, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Philippines, Colombia, Ivory Coast, Gambia, Somalia, Eritrea, Paraguay, and El Salvador. Additional research seed has been received from the commercial countries and from many other countries such as Australia, Iraq, Iran, Japan, Russia, Jordan, Yemen, Syria, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Angola, Argentina, Peru, Brazil, Cambodia, Laos, Sri Lanka, Ghana, Gabon, Greece, Italy, South Korea, Libya, Nepal, Zaire, and Tanzania. Research seed received from one country may have originated from another unspecified country. All the commercial and research introductions have Capsule Shattering Type (Character No. 23) of shattering, “SHA”.

Using selected characters from Table I, Table II provides a character differentiation between S29 and name cultivars from all over the world. From this comparison, S24, S25, S26, S28, and S29 are distinguished as being different from all other cultivars tested by Sesaco.

TABLE II Character Differentiation of Various Sesame Varieties^(a) Character Rating Name cultivars tested by Sesaco Capsule Shattering Type SHA From Venezuela: Venezuela 51, Venezuela 52, (Character No. 23) Guacara, Aceitera, Inamar, Acarigua, Morada, Capsula Larga, Arawaca, Piritu, Glauca, Turen, DV9, Fonucla, UCLA From Mexico: Pachequeno, Yori, Anna, Teras, Denisse, Canasta, Tehvantepeter From India: TMV1, TMV3 From Turkey: Ozberk, Muganli, Gamdibi, Marmara From Israel: DT45 From Guatemala: R198, R30 From Texas: Llano, Margo, Dulce, Blanco, Paloma, Oro, Renner 1 and 2, Early Russian From California: UCR3, UCR4, Eva, Calinda (Cal Beauty) From Thailand: KU18 From Korea: Danback, Gwansan, Pungyiong, Suweon, Yuseong, Hanseon, Ahnsan, Kwangsan, Jinback, Pungsan, Sodan, Yangheuk, Konheuk, Whaheuck, Sungboon SSH From Sesaco: S02, S03, S04, S05, S06, S07, S08, S09, S10, S12, S14 ID From Venezuela: G2, Morada id From Texas: Rio, Delco, Baco, Improved Baco, Roy, Eli From South Carolina: Palmetto From California: UCR234 From Sesaco: S01 SR All others, go to Non-dehiscent Test Non-dehiscent Test XX From Sesaco: S11, S15, S16, S17, S18, S19, S20, (Character No. 24) S21 ND All others, go to Branching Style Branching Style U From Sesaco: S22, 19A, 11W (Character No. 1) B All others, go to Number of Capsules per Leaf Axil Number of Capsules per Leaf Axil 3 From Sesaco: S23 (Character No. 2) 1 From Sesaco: S24, S25, S26, S28, S29 ^(a)SHA = shattering; SSH = semi-shattering; ID = indehiscent; SR = shatter resistant; XX = not non-dehiscent according to the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 6,100,452; ND = non-dehiscent according to the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 6,100,452; U = uniculm branching style; and B = true branching.

Table III provides a comparison of S24, S25, S26, S28 and S29, using all of the characters listed in Table I. The major differences in Table III are indicated in the “Dif” column by a “C” for commercially important differences and an “M” for morphological differences.

TABLE III Character Comparison of S24 through S29^(a) No. Character Year/nursery S24 S25 S26 S28 S29 Dif 1 Branching Style All B B B B B 2 Number of Capsules per Leaf Axil All 1 1 1 1 1 3 Maturity Class 2001–2004 UV M E M M E C 4 Plant Phenotype All B1M B1E B1M B1M B1E C 5 Height of Plant (cm) 2004 UV 153 154 173 170 154 C 6 Height of First Capsule (cm) 2004 UV 58 58 63 62 58 C 7 Capsule Zone Length (cm) 2004 UV 95 96 110 107 97 8 Number of Capsule Nodes 2004 UV 30 32 31 31 29 9 Average Internode Length within 2004 UV 3.2 3.1 3.6 3.5 3.4 Capsule Zone (cm) 10 Yield at Drydown (kg/ha) 2004 UV 1096 1132 1692 1748 1713 C 2004 UV com 1724 2014 1778 NT 1914 C 2004 LO 874 909 841 721 890 C 11 Resistance to Drought 2000 SA 3.6 2.5 6.4 NT NT 12 Leaf Length (cm) 5^(th) - 2004 UV 23.6 24.1 28.7 28.8 32.7 M 10^(th) - 2004 UV 20.6 18.8 27.1 23.7 22.8 M 15^(th) - 2004 UV 16.3 14.8 17.9 17.7 19.8 M 13 Leaf Blade Length (cm) 5^(th) - 2004 UV 16.1 14.9 15.5 17.0 18.2 M 10^(th) - 2004 UV 15.7 14.6 17.7 17.5 16.9 M 15^(th) - 2004 UV 13.5 12.4 14.4 14.5 16.4 M 14 Leaf Blade Width (cm) 5^(th) - 2004 UV 7.5 10.4 17.1 21.0 21.2 M 10^(th) - 2004 UV 5.1 4.3 7.0 6.5 5.8 M 15^(th) - 2004 UV 2.5 2.0 2.7 2.9 3.4 M 15 Petiole Length (cm) 5^(th) - 2004 UV 7.5 9.2 13.2 11.8 14.5 M 10^(th) - 2004 UV 4.9 4.2 9.4 6.2 5.9 M 15^(th) - 2004 UV 2.8 2.4 3.5 3.2 3.4 M 16 Number of Carpels per Capsule All 2 2 2 2 2 17 Capsule Length (cm) 2001–2004 All 2.90 2.88 2.22 2.23 2.78 M 18 Seed Weight per Capsule (g) 2001–2004 All 0.218 0.217 0.233 0.231 0.235 M 19 Capsule Weight per Capsule (g) 2001–2004 All 0.149 0.143 0.168 0.170 0.163 M 20 Capsule Weight per cm of 2001–2004 All 0.051 0.049 0.075 0.076 0.059 M Capsule (g) 21 Visual Shatter Resistance All W W W W W 22 Shaker Shatter Resistance (%) 2001–2004 All 74.3 71.6 74.5 73.9 76.1 23 Capsule Shattering Type All SR SR SR SR SR 24 Non-dehiscent Test All ND ND ND ND ND 25 Days to Flowering 2004 UV 42 42 44 44 40 26 Days to Flower Termination 2004 UV 87 83 90 88 82 27 Days to Physiological Maturity 2001–2004 UV 95 91 100 96 94 C 2004 UV 103 98 105 104 102 28 Seed Color All BF BF BF BF BF 29 Seed Weight - 100 Seeds from 10cap 2001–2004 All 0.316 0.308 0.335 0.342 0.322 C test (g) 30 Uvalde Kill Resistance 2004 UV 3.97 4.29 6.82 7.20 7.00 C 31 Resistance to Fusarium Wilt (F. oxysporum) 2004 UV 4 4+ 6+ 7 7 C 32 Resistance to Phytophtora Stem Rot NT NT NT NT NT (P. parasitica) 33 Resistance to Charcoal Rot NT NT NT NT NT (Macrophomina phaseoli) 34 Resistance to Bacterial Black Rot 2004 UV 7.89 8.00 7.31 7.04 7.97 C (Pseudomonas sesami) 35 Resistance to Silverleaf White Fly 2004 YU NEC- NEC- NEC NEC NEC C (Bemisia argentifolii) 36 Resistance to Green Peach Aphid 2004 UV 7.80 8.00 8.00 7.93 7.98 C (Myzus persica) 37 Resistance to Pod Borer (Heliothis 2001 UV NEC NEC NEC NT NT spp.) 38 Resistance to Army Worms NT NT NT NT NT (Spodoptera spp.) 39 Resistance to Cabbage Loopers NT NT NT NT NT (Pieris rapae) ^(a)B = true branches; UV = Uvalde nursery; M = medium maturity class of 95–104 days; E = early maturity class of 85–94 days; B1M = phenotype of true branches, single capsules per leaf axil, and medium maturity class of 95–104 days; B1E = phenotype of true branches, single capsules per lead axil, and early maturity class of 85–94 days; LO = Lorenzo nursery; YU = Yuma nursery; W = weather visual seed retention >75%; SR = shatter resistant; ND = non-dehiscent; BF = buff color; NT = not tested; and NEC = no economic damage - not enough disease to do ratings.

In releasing a new variety, one of the most important considerations is seed characteristics. S29 has been found to have good seed characteristics for hulling and flavor.

In releasing a new variety, another important consideration is whether the yields (Yield at Drydown, character 10) will be comparable or better than the existing varieties. In 2004 in the Uvalde irrigated nursery, S29 yield (1713 kg/ha) was comparable to S26/S28 (1692/1748 kg/ha) and better than S24/S25 (1096/1132), primarily because S24/S25 were affected by root rots (Uvalde Kill Resistance, character 30). The major pathogen in 2004 was Fusarium (Resistance to Fusarium Wilt—F. oxysporum, character 31). In a commercial field where four of the varieties were planted in strips, and there are little to no root rots, S29 (1914 kg/ha) and S25 (2014 kg/ha) were better than S26 (1778 kg/ha) and S24 (11724 kg/ha). In South Texas, S29 is comparable to all the other varieties under all conditions. In West Texas in 2004, there were cooler than normal night temperatures in August and September that affected the yields of both late planted sesame and cotton. In the Lorenzo non-irrigated nursery, S29 (890 kg/ha) was comparable to S24/S25 (874/909 kg/ha) and better than S26/S28 (841/721 kg/ha). S24 and S25 are no longer grown in West Texas because of lack of Resistance to Drought (character 11). It is projected that in years with normal night temperatures, S29 will not have a yield advantage over S26/S28, but since cool nights are unpredictable, S29 is a safer choice. S29 became a variety because the yields are comparable to the existing varieties in all conditions, and better under certain conditions.

Maturity Class (Character No. 3), Plant Phenotype (Character No.4), and Days to Physiological Maturity (Character No. 27) are all related. Maturity Class and Plant Phenotype are based on Days of Physiological Maturity. As with all system that uses classes, Maturity Class can be misleading in that division points between the classes must be subjectively chosen. In the case of Maturity Class, S29 is considered early (E) because of a Physiological Maturity of 94 days while S24 with 95 days is considered medium (M). S25 (E—91 days) has a nine day separation from S26 (M—100 days), but theoretically, the separation between can be 19 days (85 versus 104 days). The accuracy of any of the dates is plus or minus three days. Thus, there is no significant difference between S29 (94), S24 (95), and S28 (96), but there is a significant difference between S25 (91) and S26 (100). The Days to Physiological Maturity can change from year to year and from nursery to nursery depending on the environment. In computing the Days to Physiological Maturity for 1998-2004 UV, S24 is the standard at 95 days and all varieties are adjusted accordingly. In a nursery such as 2004 UV with higher fertility and moisture, the number of days are higher, but the varieties still have the same relative maturity. The Days to Physiological Maturity is commercially significant because it determines the geographical range of the variety. S25 (91 days) has a wider range than S26 (100 days) in that it can be grown further north where there are shorter growing seasons and/or can be planted later. S24, S28, and S29 fall in the middle, with S29 slightly better.

The Height of Plant (Character No.5) differences are not significant in 90% of sesame growing areas. However, in Uvalde (South Texas), there are growers that push the sesame with higher fertility and more frequent irrigations. The goal for modern platform headers has been to keep the sesame below 150 cm so that the header does not push the sesame forward before it pulls the sesame into the cutter bar. Under these growing conditions in 2004, S26 was 173 cm, while the S28 was 170 cm high, while the other 3 varieties were close to goal. Therefore, S29 is commercially suitable for all of Texas for all conditions. Morphologically, the Height of the Plant is correlated to the Height of First Capsule (character 6) and Capsule Zone Length (character 7). Generally, the higher the flowering and setting of the first capsule, the taller the plant will become. Generally, the taller the plant, the longer the capsule zone. Height of First Capsule is commercially significant below 30 cm in order to have all of the capsules above the cutter bar. None of the five varieties have this problem.

One of the major commercial advantages of S26 as a variety over S24/S25 is that it has higher Resistance to Drought (character 11). Since S28 and S29 have been selected, there has not been a drought to compare drought resistance to S24/S25/S26.

In all crops diseases and pests can reduce yields substantially. As discussed above, Uvalde Kill Resistance (character 30) has reduced yields in South Texas and Oklahoma. In some years, Resistance to Bacterial Black Rot (character 34) has been recorded in that the disease is more prevalent under the following conditions: cool nights, high humidity, and cloudy days. In the 2004 Uvalde nursery, the disease did appear, and varieties that have shown lack of resistance in the past had problems. Ratings (0-8 scale with 0=problems on all leaves, and 8=no problems on any leaves) were done on only advanced lines. The ratings for the five varieties are provided in Table III. Although there are differences ranging from 7.04 to 8.00, there was no economic damage done to the five varieties in this report. With a rating of 7.97, S29 should have no economic problems.

In the early 1990s, Resistance to Silverleaf White Fly (character 35) was recorded. However, there have been no problems in Texas in recent years on any crops. The white flies persist in Arizona to a lesser degree than in the early 1990s when sesame production in both Arizona and northern Mexico had be discontinued. In 2004 in Yuma, Ariz., there were 20 lines planted in early April. There were white flies on all of the lines, but more on S24 and S25 than on S26, S28, or S29. Yield samples were not taken to ascertain the amount of yield loss, but S24 and S25 did lose leaves which is an indicator of damage. In commercial fields planted later, side by side S24 had substantial damage versus S25 with some damage. There was no later S26, S28, nor S29 for comparison.

In the early 1990s, Resistance to Green Peach Aphid (character 36) was a problem in commercial sesame. There have been sporadic problems since then, but nothing as serious as 1992, 1993, and 1995. Lines with lack of resistance were purged out of the breeding program. In the 2004 UV nurseries the aphids appeared in the southeast portion of the nursery. There was major damage done to some lines, and the aphids did spread to a lesser degree over the rest of the nursery. There were certain lines where the aphids severely attacked the plots in all sections of the nursery. Ratings (0-8 scale with 0=aphids on all plants and killing, and 8=no aphids on any plants) were taken on all lines in the nursery, but the distribution in Table I was only for lines in the southeast corner. Ratings for the five varieties are provided in Table III. Although there are differences ranging from 7.80 to 8.00, there was no economic damage done to the five varieties in this report. Problem lines had ratings between 1 and 4. With a rating of 7.98, S29 should have no economic problems with green peach aphids.

Some of the data given in Table III shows how S29 is morphologically different from the other varieties (marked with an M in the Dif column), but these differences are not commercially significant. The two major areas of morphological differences are in the capsule characters and the size of the leaves.

In entering commercial fields without knowing beforehand which variety is planted, the capsule differences will distinguish S29 from the other four varieties. S29 has close to the Capsule Length (character 17) of S24 and S25, and considerably longer than S26 and S28. S29 is between S24/S25 and S26/S28 on Capsule Weight per cm of Capsule (character 20). As mentioned before, there is a very high positive correlation between capsule width and Capsule Weight per cm of Capsule. Basically, S29 has a slightly shorter and wider capsule than S24/S25, and a longer and slightly narrower capsule than S26/S28. Wongyai (Wongyai W. and S. Juttpornpong, 1992. “Indirect selection for seed weight in sesame using capsule size as a criteria,” Sesame and Safflower Newsletter, No. 7, p. 4-7) showed a positive correlation between capsule width and Seed Weight—100 Seeds from Whole Plant, which is a commercially significant difference as discussed previously.

In entering commercial fields without knowing beforehand which variety is planted, the leaf differences can provide clues as to distinguish S29 from the other four varieties. Leaf dimensions are more sensitive to moisture and fertility levels than capsule characters, and thus in looking at a single variety, it is difficult to distinguish any variety by leaves alone. When comparing all five varieties within one field, the leaf differnces will distinguish S29 from the other four varieties. S29 has longer leaves, wider leaves, and longer petioles than S24 and S25 as shown in Leaf Length (Character No. 12), Leaf Blade Length (Character No. 13), Leaf Blade Width (Character No. 14), and Petiole Length (Character No. 15). S29 has larger leaves at the 5^(th) node than S26 and S28, smaller leaves at the 10^(th) node, and larger leaves at the 15^(th). To date, all lines have larger leaves at the bottom of the plant and smaller leaves at the top of the plant. All five varieties follow this pattern. With the present agronomic practices, the sizes of the leaves have no commercial significance.

On Feb. 22, 2005, a deposit of at least 2500 seeds of sesame plant S29 was made by Sesaco Corporation under the provisions of the Budapest Treaty with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, Va. 20110-2209, and the deposit was given ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598. This deposit will be maintained in the ATCC depository for a period of 30 years or 5 years after the last request or for the enforceable life of the patent, whichever is longer. Should the seeds from the sesame line S29 deposited with the American Type Culture Collection become unviable, the deposit will be replaced by Sesaco Corporation upon request.

The foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and characters for purposes of clarity and understanding. However, it will be obvious that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the invention as limited only by the scope of the appended claims. 

1. A seed of sesame variety designated S29, a sample of said seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598.
 2. A sesame plant or a part thereof produced by growing the seed of sesame variety S29, a sample of said seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598.
 3. Pollen of said sesame plant of claim
 2. 4. A sesame plant having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of sesame variety S29, a sample of the seed of said variety having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598.
 5. A tissue culture of regenerable cells produced from seed of sesame variety S29, a sample of said seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598.
 6. A tissue culture of regenerable cells produced from sesame plant S29 or a part thereof produced by growing the seed of sesame variety S29, a sample of said seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598.
 7. A sesame plant regenerated from a tissue culture of regenerable cells produced from seed of sesame variety S29, a sample of said seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598, wherein said regenerated sesame plant has all the physiological and morphological characteristics of said sesame variety S29.
 8. A sesame plant regenerated from a tissue culture of regenerable cells produced from a sesame plant produced by growing the seed of sesame variety S29, a sample of said seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598, wherein said regenerated sesame plant has all the physiological and morphological characteristics of said sesame variety S29.
 9. A method of producing sesame seed, comprising crossing a first parent sesame plant with a second parent sesame plant and harvesting the resultant sesame seed, wherein said first or second parent sesame plant was produced by growing seed of sesame variety S29, a sample of said seed having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6598. 